Leadership ‘merry-go-round’ at universities as v-c vacancies grow

Quarter of UK universities changing vice-chancellors after several retire and some forced out, with experts predicting continuing challenges mean churn at the top will only continue

Published on
February 9, 2026
Last updated
February 9, 2026
Man wearing a suit on a merry-go-round
Source: Nick Rowe/Getty Images

The high rate of turnover of UK university vice-chancellors has been compared to the “managerial merry-go-round” of top football clubs amid warnings that some leadership positions are becoming increasingly unattractive.

Analysis by Times Higher Education has found that more than a quarter of Universities UK members changed vice-chancellors in 2025 or are set to do so in 2026. This intensifies a trend seen in 2024, when about a fifth of the sector made a change.

Of the 38 leadership changeovers, almost half (17) are retiring and a quarter (nine) are moving to lead another UK university.

Richard Watermeyer, professor of higher education at the University of Bristol, said leaders moving from one institution to another could reflect the “limited talent pool” within the UK, as well as top positions becoming increasingly unattractive.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We just don’t have within the UK system those leaders that are perhaps best positioned to respond to what seem to be pretty intractable challenges that the sector faces.”

Some leaders have now led several institutions. Karen Stanton was promoted to the top job at the University of the Arts London after a spell as interim leader. She had previously been interim vice-chancellor at Lincoln Bishop University, and vice-chancellor of York St John University and Solent University.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s a similar merry-go-round that you see within the top tiers of football with managers being parachuted in in the hope that they provide quick-fix solutions to problems that are incredibly baked in,” added Watermeyer of the sector trend.

The decision of one vice-chancellor to move on, as Anton Muscatelli did, can have knock-on effects. His position at the University of Glasgow was filled by Andy Schofield of Lancaster University, who was replaced in turn as vice-chancellor by Glasgow Caledonian University’s Steve Decent.

Kim Peters, professor of management at the University of Exeter, said the need for financial management skills, which might be hard for someone on the academic track to acquire, could be contributing to the poaching of other vice-chancellors.

“The tertiary sector is entering a period of contraction and consolidation. Given that organisations are especially likely to pursue change when faced with external challenges, the churn is likely to continue.”

Several leaders stepped down amid financial challenges – Frances Corner at Goldsmiths, University of London and Ian Gillespie at the University of Dundee. Both positions have been temporarily filled, with searches for permanent leaders ongoing.

Richard Bolden, professor of leadership and management at the University of the West of England, said fiscal challenges have caused “significant turbulence” in leadership – but other factors such as artificial intelligence might soon start to have an impact.

“At the moment, it may seem that financial management skills are particularly significant, however, an ability to navigate massive digital disruption and also social change is going to be a really significant skill set for the future.”

About 35 per cent of the filled vacancies were promotions from within the same university, and 38 per cent were replaced by a senior leader from another UK institution.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Churn at the top therefore causes disruption throughout a university. Bolden said universities have a great capacity for continuing to function relatively effectively despite gaps in senior leadership, but it does limit their ability to be strategic and forward-looking.

Peters said appointing a new leader is often an indicator of large-scale organisational upheaval, with frequent change linked to reduced productivity, higher stress, lower morale, and increased staff turnover.

Some universities were forced to replace their leaders unexpectedly. James Tooley unsuccessfully reapplied for his own job after he was suspended by the University of Buckingham over allegations relating to a past relationship. And George Holmes was suspended by the University of Greater Manchester with the institution being investigated over fraud allegations.

Analysis of accounts shows that departures can sometimes be costly. Jane Roscoe left by “mutual agreement” after just over a year at the University for the Creative Arts, and received over £120,000 in compensation for loss of office. Similarly, Nick Braisby received an ex gratia compensation payment of £76,000 after stepping down at Buckinghamshire New University – along with £144,000 in deferred salary. He then subsequently became interim vice-chancellor at the University of Bradford.

Aleks Subic of Aston University is leaving for Australia in April, taking over at Torrens University. He follows Max Lu, previously of the University of Surrey, who has taken over at the University of Wollongong.

But none of the new appointees of UK universities have come from overseas, which could suggest a preference among search committees for people familiar with the UK context and its challenges, according to Peters.

While some in the sector will be crying out for “real transformational leadership”, Watermeyer said the innate conservatism of the sector may be contributing to the desire for a “safe pair of hands” in charge.

But he warned that international applicants might also be put off by “a sector in dire straits”, where the top jobs are paid significantly less than US peers but receive plenty of scrutiny over their pay.

The most left-field appointment was perhaps Paul Kett at London South Bank University, who was previously a consultant and high-ranking civil servant.

Before his tenure, LSBU was briefly led by interim co-vice-chancellors, which Bolden said should be a model that some institutions consider in the long term.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Increasingly the size of our organisations, the complexity, the challenges, may begin to raise questions as to whether this is a job that’s maybe too big or too complex for a single person.”

patrick.jack@timeshighereducation.com

Universities with new leaders

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT