World University Rankings 2014-2015 results

Latest results suggest that underfunded Western institutions outside the elite are struggling

October 2, 2014

View the full World University Rankings 2014-2015 top 400

Claim your free copy of the World University Rankings 2014-2015 supplement

Evidence is emerging of a decline in the power of US universities in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2014-2015, despite the California Institute of Technology’s claim on the top spot for the fourth consecutive year.

The West Coast institution heads a top 10 for 2014-15 that still consists almost entirely of US-based universities, with only the universities of Oxford (third) and Cambridge (fifth) and Imperial College London (joint ninth) preventing a clean sweep.

But despite the fact that Harvard (second), Stanford (fourth), the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (sixth), Princeton University (seventh), the University of California, Berkeley (eighth) and Yale University (joint ninth) all make the top 10, there is evidence of an overall decline for US universities, with significant losses further down the league table. This includes the University of Chicago, which slips from ninth to 11th.

The US has 74 universities in the top 200, down from 77 last year. Some 60 per cent of those institutions rank lower than they did 12 months ago, with an average fall of 5.34 places per university.

It is a similar story for Canada. While the University of Toronto retains 20th place and the University of Victoria joins the top 200 in joint 173rd place, all other Canadian top 200 universities have lost ground.

The UK, meanwhile, has lost three universities from the top 200 (the University of Reading, the University of Dundee and Newcastle University), and now has 29 top 200 institutions, down from 31.

Conversely, the leading Asian institutions continue to rise, and the continent now has 24 universities in the world top 200, four more than last year. Two Asian universities make the world top 25 (the University of Tokyo and the National University of Singapore), while six feature among the top 50.

Pie chart of institutions in top 400 of World University Rankings by region

“Western universities, in many cases starved of vital public funding, are losing ground,” said Phil Baty, THE rankings editor, who added that there was “something approaching a crisis” for US state institutions.

Philip Altbach, director of the Center for International Higher Education at Boston College, said that the “serious hit” in funding to the “great American public universities” had major implications for US science and competitiveness.

He added that on average Canada had a better higher education system than the US, without the “peaks nor the valleys” found among the ranking positions of American universities. “[Canada’s] top universities are excellent, but could easily be even better if they had the additional funding – and probably the competitive spirit – needed,” Dr Altbach said.

In Europe, Germany gains two new top 200 representatives (Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen and Technische Universität Dresden), to overtake the Netherlands as the third most represented nation behind the US and the UK.

The THE World University Rankings, powered by Thomson Reuters, use 13 performance indicators to examine universities’ strengths.

View the full World University Rankings 2014-2015 top 400

Anglo-American empire: WUR top 10 
2014-15 Rank 2013-14 Rank Institution Country
1 1 California Institute of Technology US
2 =2 Harvard University US
3 =2 University of Oxford UK
4 4 Stanford University US
5 7 University of Cambridge UK
6 5 Massachusetts Institute of Technology US
7 6 Princeton University US
8 8 University of California, Berkeley US
=9 10 Imperial College London UK
=9 11 Yale University US


Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Reader's comments (1)

Another fine product from the nonsense factory, and once again completely out of sync with AWRU, QS, The Guardian, and every other system that doesn't use Tomson-Reuters broken metric. How else to explain why some universities can drop _50 spots_ in a single year, while others go up as much. Did half the former burn down? Did the latter double their staff size in a single, glorious leap? Ridiculous, and should be ignored altogether.


Featured jobs