Grant winners - 16 January 2014

January 16, 2014

Royal Society

University Research Fellowships

Using Yang-Mills theory to understand objects with five spatial dimensions in M-theory (M5-branes)

  • Award winner: Yulia Yuzenkova
  • Institution: Newcastle University
  • Value: £4,141

Mechanisms of cyanobacterial transcription

 

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

Research Grants

  • Award winner: Simon McQueen-Mason
  • Institution: University of York
  • Value: £2,820,184

Learning from marine wood borers: enzymes and mechanisms of lignocellulose digestion

  • Award winner: Sarah Zylinski
  • Institution: University of Leeds
  • Value: £353,593

Investigating depth perception in non-human vision using the dynamic camouflage of cuttlefish

 

National Institute for Health Research

Health Technology Assessment Programme

  • Award winner: Jonathan Sterne
  • Institution: University of Bristol
  • Value: £240,193

What is/are the best oral anticoagulant/s for primary prevention, treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic disease, and for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation?

  • Award winner: Hazel Everitt
  • Institution: University of Southampton
  • Value: £1,232,554

ACTIB (assessing cognitive behavioural therapy in irritable bowel): a randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness of therapist-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy and web-based self-management in irritable bowel syndrome

 

Leverhulme Trust

Research Project Grants
Sciences

  • Award winner: Robert Leech
  • Institution: Imperial College London
  • Value: £175,806

Vocal learning and the importance of noise

  • Award winner: Aris Karastergiou
  • Institution: University of Oxford
  • Value: £230,685

Real-time discovery on next-generation telescopes with graphics processing units

  • Award winner: Mark Brosnan
  • Institution: University of Bath
  • Value: £210,761

Computer-delivered social stories to reduce challenging behaviour in ASD

Embodied evolutionary computing design: vertical axis wind turbine case study

Humanities

Scripture, dissent and deaf space: St Saviour’s, Oxford Street

In detail

Jules Holroyd, University of Nottingham

Award winner: Jules Holroyd
Institution: University of Nottingham
Value: £220,608

Bias and blame: do moral interactions modulate the expression of implicit bias?

This project will explore whether moral interactions – such as being blamed or being held responsible – are useful tools for regulating implicit bias. Studies have shown that implicit biases – automatic associations made without reflective control – can lead to unintentionally different or unfair treatment of stigmatised individuals. Such biases are common, resistant to deliberate moderation, and significant influences on judgement and action. Psychologists and philosophers have developed and tried strategies to regulate implicit bias, but none has looked into holding individuals responsible. This is what the team will investigate.

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham