Pay hikes at Russell Group likely to stoke discontent over wages

Although remuneration slipped off the top of the agenda at UK universities last year, generous salary rises for v-cs will not be overlooked, says Jack Grove

January 5, 2017
UCU dispute board
Source: Alamy
Some staff at UK universities walked out in 2016 over pay and conditions

With Brexit, the teaching excellence framework and campus freedom of speech issues occupying academics’ thoughts in 2016, the issue of pay in higher education struggled to win much attention.

But most academics realise that it was not a great year salary-wise for university staff, whose unhappiness over a 1 per cent national pay rise in 2015-16 was hardly lifted by this year’s 1.1 per cent deal imposed in the autumn.

That discontent was compounded by the closure of final salary pension schemes at pre-92 universities in April, with staff stumping up higher employee contributions to cover Universities Superannuation Scheme and National Insurance reforms, while rising inflation now threatens to eat into the real value of salaries in 2017.

So, reading how vice-chancellors at the UK’s top universities saw their pay packages swell by 6 per cent last year will hardly lighten their mood – with bonuses seemingly available for top brass while pay rises for rank-and-file staff remained minimal.

Employers will argue that this narrative does not tell the full story. Universities have paid out about 4 per cent extra in pay to cover additional costs for pensions and NI last year, they insist, while average pay increases were closer to 2.5 per cent last year if incremental rises enjoyed by many staff are included.

Others will point to the fact that a hefty pay-off to a departing vice-chancellor can distort the overall picture, which saw some university leaders (including those at the University of Nottingham and the University of Leeds) take no pay rise at all.

Last year’s staff walkouts and campus demonstrations over pay, however, suggest that the thorny issue of remuneration will not be settled for some time, particularly if a post-Brexit fall in international students puts a further squeeze on any future salary rise, as many fear it will.

This year’s analysis of Russell Group pay also considers how the heads of top US and Australian universities have fared recently, with overall pay packages still far in excess of those found in the UK, although the gap is perhaps not as large as some imagine.

Given the multibillion-dollar turnover of top US universities (the University of Pennsylvania’s turnover was $6.6 billion (£5.38 billion) in 2013-14 compared with the University of Oxford’s £1.3 billion in 2015-16), some might even view their presidents’ pay as reasonable.

And with $5 million-plus salaries sometimes handed to various US college football coaches and other highly paid university staff (one medic at Pennsylvania was paid $8 million, the latest figures show), it seems that US universities have other types of “fat cats” to worry about.

jack.grove@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Generous increases at top-tier institutions likely to stoke discontent over earnings

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Alexander Wedderburn

Former president of the British Psychological Society remembered

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham