Grant winners - 26 June 2014

June 26, 2014

Action Medical Research

Epilepsy in children – improving scanning before surgery

  • Award winner: Elizabeth Tanner
  • Institution: University of Glasgow
  • Value: £117,5

Breathing difficulties – developing a stent for tracheal (windpipe) deformities in children

 

Royal Society

Wolfson Research Merit Awards
Awards are worth £10,000-£30,000 a year, which is a salary enhancement

  • Award winner: Jonathan Higgins
  • Institution: Newcastle University

Histone phosphorylation in mitosis and meiosis

  • Award winner: Jonathan Keating
  • Institution: University of Bristol

Statistics of arithmetic functions and matrix integrals

  • Award winner: Oscar Marin
  • Institution: King’s College London

Understanding cortical interneurons in health and disease

  • Award winner: James Naismith
  • Institution: University of St Andrews

Characterising membrane proteins by biophysical methods

 

Leverhulme Trust

Research Project Grants
Sciences

  • Award winner: Mahesh Marina
  • Institution: University of Edinburgh
  • Value: £232,512

Application-oriented TV white space networking

  • Award winner: Douglas Mair
  • Institution: University of Aberdeen
  • Value: £238,775

Calving glaciers: long-term validation and evidence

Artificial Paramecium: intelligent distributed sensing and manipulation by ciliates

  • Award winner: Ortwin Hess
  • Institution: Imperial College London
  • Value: £184,819

Extreme non-linear chirality in THz metasurfaces

International Network Grants
Social sciences

  • Award winner: Par Engstrom
  • Institution: University College London
  • Value: £124,799

The Inter-American human rights system: assessing its development and impact

  • Award winner: Francesco Goglia
  • Institution: University of Exeter
  • Value: £94,658

Shifting sociolinguistic realities of the nation of East Timor and its diasporas

In detail

Tamsin Saxton, Northumbria University

Award winner: Tamsin Saxton
Institution: Northumbria University
Value: £53,266

Dating, mating and relating: how parents shape offspring partner choice

This project blends theoretical biology and cognitive psychology in a study of how parents – subconsciously and directly – could influence their grown-up children’s preferences and behaviour when it comes to choosing partners. The research will investigate the reasoning behind partner choice and how it might lead to family conflicts. It is also significant for understanding Charles Darwin’s theory of sexual selection – the extra evolutionary pressure that reproduction exerts. “The project is motivated by evolutionary theory,” explains Dr Saxton. “We often behave in ways that increase the likelihood of the survival and reproduction of our genes. Our genes can be propagated via our grandchildren; yet the characteristics of our grandchildren are closely tied up with our offspring’s partner choice. So parents might be shaping their offspring’s choice of partner in ways that might enhance their evolutionary prospects.”

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham