Grant winners - 11 July 2013

July 11, 2013

National Institute for Health Research

Health Technology Assessment Programme

The clinical and cost-effectiveness of lamotrigine for people with borderline personality disorder: a randomised controlled trial 

The clinical and cost-effectiveness of temporarily quadrupling the dose of inhaled steroid to prevent asthma exacerbations: a pragmatic, randomised, normal care-controlled, clinical trial

 

European Commission

  • Award winner: Brian Tighe
  • Institution: Aston University
  • Value: £237,744

Develop new contact lens systems for ocular drug delivery

To develop nanomaterial photonic sensor for food manufacturing

Advanced regenerator technologies for high-capacity systems

 

Economic and Social Research Council

Transformative Research Call: ‘Transforming’ Social Science

Maximum limit of £250,000; will run for 18 months.

  • Award winner: Fernand Gobet
  • Institution: University of Liverpool

Automatic generation of scientific theories

  • Award winner: Stephen Reicher
  • Institution: University of St Andrews

Beyond the “banality of evil”: a new understanding of conformity and atrocity

 

Leverhulme Trust

Research Project Grants
Sciences

  • Award winner: Adrian Chaplin
  • Institution: University of Warwick
  • Value: £160,874

Transition metal-based [2]rotaxanes for the investigation of alkane activation

  • Award winner: David Fermin
  • Institution: University of Bristol
  • Value: £141,512

Novel dehydrogenase-based architectures for electrocatalytic conversion of liquid fuels

Humanities

  • Award winner: Stephen Rippon
  • Institution: University of Exeter
  • Value: £98,381

Planning in the early medieval landscape: technology, society and settlement

International Networks
Sciences

  • Award winner: Pat Monaghan
  • Institution: University of Glasgow
  • Value: £98,000

Interdisciplinary network on telomere biology

Social sciences

In detail

Chris Reed, University of Dundee

Award winner: Chris Reed
Institution: University of Dundee
Value: £188,834

DrEAMS: dialogue-based exploration of argument and mediation space

Publicly funded mediation offers a cheaper alternative to litigation, but still costs tens of millions of pounds. This project aims to build a philosophically and linguistically grounded model of the mediation process to serve as a foundation for developing software tools to provide practical support. The project will develop an argument-mapping tool built on a theoretical account of argumentation in dispute mediation. It will also develop models of dialogue for the approach, depending on factors such as the willingness of the parties to participate and the exact stage of the process.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham