Ruling forces release of Cambridge sheep research data

Information Commissioner orders university to share information with animal rights groups following FoI request

July 2, 2015
Sheep on white background

The University of Cambridge has been ordered by the Information Commissioner to release information on sheep research requested under the Freedom of Information Act.

Last year, the animal rights charity Cruelty Free International, previously known as the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection, asked to see Cambridge’s Home Office project licences relating to several projects using sheep.

But Cambridge refused, arguing that releasing information about the possible adverse effects of the procedures on the animals “would be likely to increase protest and activism”, which could in turn threaten staff and students. It drew attention to past instances of animal rights protests in Cambridge, as well as to recent “scientific papers” which had elicited online comments “to the effect that researchers should themselves be harmed if they caused harm to animals”, and recent posters in Cambridge “offering cash to name those working in animal research”.

However, the commissioner agreed with the charity that the concerns were undermined by the fact that the researchers had themselves “been advertising the research in publications and on the internet in relation to one of the licences”, and by the university’s publication on its website of contact information for the researchers, plus “links to their animal research studies”. The commissioner also pointed out that extremist activity had declined sharply in recent years and was persuaded by evidence from the charity Understanding Animal Research that research organisations that are transparent about their use of animals are less likely to be singled out by protesters.

UAR was instrumental in the launch last year of the Concordat on Openness on Animal Research, whose 91 signatories – including Cambridge – commit to greater openness about animal research.

For similar reasons, the commissioner dismissed the university’s claim that its commercial interests would be damaged by increased protests, such as by contractors withdrawing from contracts to build new animal facilities.

Welcoming the ruling, Michelle Thew, chief executive of Cruelty Free International, said: “It is essential for informed public debate – about the ethics and the science – that as much information about what exactly happens to animals and why is available…Some of the research on sheep at Cambridge – [such as] starving them of oxygen – raises very serious welfare concerns.”

A spokesman for Cambridge said that the university would comply with the commissioner’s ruling.

paul.jump@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

POSTSCRIPT:

Article originally published as: Ruling to force release of sheep research data (2 July 2015)

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry