Sector signs up to animal research openness

Signatories commit to greater transparency to assuage public concerns

May 15, 2014

More than 70 universities, pharmaceutical companies, learned societies and research funders have committed to greater transparency over their involvement in animal research.

The Concordat on Openness on Animal Research in the UK, launched on 14 May, commits signatories to clarity about when and how they use animals in research. They will have to provide “accurate descriptions of the benefits, harms and limitations of such research” and “respond to reasonable enquiries” for further information.

The concordat has been developed over 18 months following concerns in 2012 that public support for animal research was falling.

The signatories “recognise that…to be seen as trustworthy we must be open, transparent, and accountable for the research that we conduct, fund or support, including when the high standards we strive for are not achieved”.

They hope to allow the public to “debate the issues from a position of knowing the facts and make up their own minds about animal research”.

Signatories will do their best to implement certain practical measures, such as posting their animal research policies on their websites and mentioning in media releases when animal research has played a “significant role” in breakthroughs.

But although allowing “accredited journalists, MPs and local school, patient and community groups” to visit animal facilities is “strongly encouraged”, the concordat acknowledges that there will “sometimes be practical reasons why access may not be possible”.

Each institution will report annually on its progress on openness; the charity Understanding Animal Research, which is coordinating the concordat, will combine these reports into a sector overview.

Any organisation that makes no progress “will be asked to reconsider its position as a signatory”. In addition, the concordat will be amended as necessary following a review of its impact after three years.

Earlier this month, the government began a consultation on changing the law to allow the Home Office to release more information on the animal experiments it has licensed.

A spokesman for pressure group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals said “lifting the veil of secrecy” around animal testing would help to “hasten” moves away from “the archaic notion of experimenting on other species and towards human-relevant science”.

paul.jump@tsleducation.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (15 December 2016)

Mark Readman offers a guide to help selfish academics ensure that everyone at a conference knows they are very special indeed

David Parkins Christmas illustration (22 December 2016)

A Dickensian tale, set in today’s university

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (5 January 2017)

Fixing problems in the academic job market by reducing the number of PhDs would homogenise the sector, argues Tom Cutterham

Houses of Parliament, Westminster, government

There really is no need for the Higher Education and Research Bill, says Anne Sheppard

Jefferson with paint over face

Buildings and statues dedicated to people whose views clash with modern values can cause difficulties, but is tearing down history the answer?