REF 2014 winners: who performed best?

King’s College London raised its GPA while submitting more staff. Who were the other notable achievers and underachievers?

December 18, 2014

Source: Reuters

King’s College London: up 15 places to 7

Download full REF 2014 results

Overall ranking of institutions
Overall ranking of institutions including power market share
Ranking of institutions on impact
Institutions ranked by subject
Ranking of institutions on output


King’s College London is arguably the biggest winner in the 2014 research excellence framework.

The institution has risen 15 places on grade point average, from joint 22nd in 2008’s research assessment exercise to seventh in 2014’s REF.

Cardiff University, which was also joint 22nd in 2008, has risen one position higher than King’s, to sixth, and comfortably achieved its strategic aim of ranking in the top 10.

However, Cardiff drastically reduced the number of people it submitted, from 1,030 full-time equivalents in 2008 to 738 this time. This means that the institution has actually fallen, to 18th position from 15th in 2008, when judged on research power, which is calculated by multiplying an institution’s GPA by the number of staff it submitted.

Some observers prefer the research power measure to GPA as the basis for rankings because it gives a better sense of which institutions are likely to win the most quality-related research funding – which is also calculated on the basis of the quality and volume of an institution’s submission.

In contrast to Cardiff, King’s improved its GPA while submitting more people: 1,369, compared with 1,172 in 2008. This means that its ranking on research power has risen from 11th to sixth, and its market share of total UK research power (which reflects its share of the annual £1.6 billion QR pot) has grown from 2.37 per cent to 2.85 per cent (see full figures on market share).

High risers

By GPA, Cardiff Metropolitan University recorded the largest rise, leaping 62 places, from 103rd to 41st. However, it submitted only 35 staff, compared with 102 in 2008, when it was known as the University of Wales Institute, Cardiff.

Other notable risers on GPA include Queen Margaret University (up from 129th to joint 80th) and the University of the Highlands and Islands (from joint 96th to joint 63rd). Among research-intensive institutions, Swansea University made the biggest leap, from joint 52nd position to joint 26th.

As for reversals, Soas, University of London suffered the greatest, dropping from joint 31st in 2008 to 61st. Another notable faller was the University of Essex, which slid 24 places to joint 35th on GPA.

The largest percentage point rise in market share of total UK research power was recorded by University College London, where it went from 3.83 per cent to 5.33 per cent. This reflects a large increase in its submitted headcount, from 1,793 to 2,566, after its absorption since 2008 of the School of Pharmacy and, just this month, the Institute of Education. It is now the largest institution by submission volume, followed by the University of Oxford and the University of Cambridge, but it is only joint 18th on its output GPA and joint eighth on overall GPA.

Northumbria University expanded its research power market share, from 0.26 per cent to 0.6 per cent, after more than doubling its submission volume. It is also the biggest riser when ranked by research power, climbing from 80th to 50th.

The University of Manchester was a notable institution to take a hit on research power. Its market share shrank from 3.87 per cent to 3.18 per cent with a submission of 263 fewer staff. Its ranking by GPA also dropped, from eighth to 17th.

London Metropolitan University fell the most on ranking by research power, down 32 places to 103rd.

paul.jump@tesglobal.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (10)

But the said institution doesn't exist under this name anymore.
Slightly overstating the case here. King's College London will keep its current name til early 2015 - and will retain KCL as its legal name. The brand - which, as the article notes here, is doing pretty well thanks to its research staff - will change to King's London.
Market share of research power. What a nauseating phrase. Academic research is not a market, it is not a zero sum game. I think it says a lot about the people who formulated and administer the REF that they use such language.
'Some observers prefer the research power measure to GPA as the basis for rankings because it gives a better sense of which institutions are likely to win the most quality-related research funding' And actually getting more money tells us what, exactly, about the excellence of a university's research ? And while I'm at it, the 'some observers' would get a red-ink question mark on an essay I was marking. Which observers ? It matters, because then we might know from which position they observe. Come on THE, shape up.
Please tell the whole story. London met may have fallen, by research power, but that is because the number of FTEs has fallen. In my UoA we've gone from 12.5 in 2008 to 7.5 in 2014. As a result, research power inevitably falls. GPA, however, has risen. Quality has gone up, not down.
Can someone at THE calculate the weighted GPA i.e. = GPA x proportion of academic staff submitted
@Michael Brockhurst - this is what research power is.
@christopher satterely No, this is GPA intensity. @Michael Brockhurst Agreed but the HESA data are a mess, so its hard to do
@Michael Brockurst - see http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/ref-2014-winners-and-losers-in-intensity-ranking/2017633.article
This new Research Power claim is all nonsense - unless everyone plays by the same rules (i.e all staff must submitted or only your best). In terms of the old GPA rules Cardiff Metropolitian University played a blinder: A score up in the ranks of the Russell group elite! Why, because it submitted a limited number of staff in a limited number of Units. Truly "islands of excellences" (remember that phrase) which HEFCE could point at and specifically fund in the non-Research intensive Universities. What do we have now with research power? A complete mess, what will foreign governments make of it? So research excellence is not important anymore, it is volume? Is it any volume of research regardless?. Clearly, the post 92's in general can not produce excellence at volume and when the funding formula finally appears (only 3* and 4* fractions being funded and STEM financially more so) let us see if the THE power calculation correlates closely with the QR awards.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

question marks PhD study

Selecting the right doctorate is crucial for success. Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman share top 10 tips on how to pick a PhD

India, UK, flag

Sir Keith Burnett reflects on what he learned about international students while in India with the UK prime minister

Pencil lying on open diary

Requesting a log of daily activity means that trust between the institution and the scholar has broken down, says Toby Miller

Application for graduate job
Universities producing the most employable graduates have been ranked by companies around the world in the Global University Employability Ranking 2016
Construction workers erecting barriers

Directly linking non-EU recruitment to award levels in teaching assessment has also been under consideration, sources suggest