Grant winners – 26 March 2015

March 26, 2015

National Institute for Health Research

Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme

Development and evaluation of machine learning methods in whole body magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion weighted imaging for staging of patients with cancer. (Machine learning in whole body oncology: MALIBO)

Health Services and Delivery Research Programme

A rapid evidence synthesis of outcomes and care utilisation following self-care support for children and adolescents with long-term conditions (REfOCUS): Reducing care utilisation without compromising health outcomes

Economic evaluation of alternative strategies for maintaining the supply of blood to the NHS

  • Award winner: Adam J. Noble
  • Institution: University of Liverpool
  • Value: £424,127

Seizure first aid training for epilepsy (SAFE) for people with epilepsy who attend A&E, and their family and friends: intervention development and pilot


Royal Society

Wolfson Research Merit Awards

Awards are worth £10,000-£30,000 a year, which is a salary enhancement

  • Award winner: Paola Borri
  • Institution: Cardiff University

Shedding new light on cells with coherent multiphoton nanoscopy

  • Award winner: Sian Ellard
  • Institution: University of Exeter

Improving clinical care in monogenic diabetes through genomics

  • Award winner: Franco Cacialli
  • Institution: University College London

Fundamentals and applications of printable and nanostructured semiconductors


Leverhulme Trust

International Networks

  • Award winner: Margaret-Anne Hutton
  • Institution: University of St Andrews
  • Value: £86,297

Network for contemporary studies: what is the contemporary?

Research Project Grants

  • Award winner: Hugo Christenson
  • Institution: University of Leeds
  • Value: £162,138

Effects of topography on ice nucleation

  • Award winner: Lucia Garrido
  • Institution: Brunel University London
  • Value: £202,083

Multisensory processing of faces and voices in person identity recognition

In detail

Chris Brooks, University of Reading

Social sciences

Award winner: Chris Brooks
Institution: University of Reading
Value: £196,249

The first real estate bubble? Land prices and rents in medieval England c.1200–1550

This project will examine the workings of the real estate market in the 13th to the 15th centuries to investigate whether a real estate bubble existed in medieval England. Earlier studies by the team have shown that medieval financial markets were far more sophisticated than previously thought. The project is hoping to advance understanding of the medieval property market by utilising cutting-edge econometric techniques. The study will give a national overview and also examine regional variations in property prices and rents, hopefully identifying if the North-South divide can be traced back to the Middle Ages. Better data on property prices and rental values will also help to understand wealth distribution and changes in living standards over the long run.

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham