Grant winners - 1 January 2015

January 1, 2015

National Institute for Health Research

Health Services and Delivery Research Programme

Acute hospital care for frail older people

Patient-centred assessment method (PCAM): improving nurse-led biopsychosocial assessment of patients with long-term conditions and co-morbid mental health needs

Health Technology Assessment Programme

  • Award winner: Michael Bennett
  • Institution: University of Leeds
  • Value: £393,491

Self-management of analgesia and related treatments at the end of life (SMARTE)

At-risk registers integrated into primary care to stop asthma crises in the UK (ARRISA-UK): a pragmatic cluster randomised trial with nested economic and process evaluations examining the effects of integrating at-risk asthma registers into primary care with internet-based training and support


Leverhulme Trust

Research Project Grants

  • Award winner: Ian Ruffell
  • Institution: University of Glasgow
  • Value: £282,881

Hero of Alexandria and his theatrical automata

  • Award winner: Tim Shephard
  • Institution: University of Sheffield
  • Value: £247,972

Music in the art of Renaissance Italy, c. 1420-1540

  • Award winner: Andrew Wood
  • Institution: Durham University
  • Value: £189,360

Social relations and everyday life in England, 1500-1640


Wellcome Trust/Department for International Development

Modelling the Ebola epidemic in West Africa

In detail

Brigid Daniel, University of Stirling and Nina Biehal, Universoty of York

British Association for Adoption and Fostering (BAAF) in Scotland

Award winners: Brigid Daniel (left) and Nina Biehal
Institutions: University of Stirling and University of York
Value: £400,000

Permanently Progressing?

This project, the first study of its kind in Scotland, will focus on children and young people who have had difficult starts in life. The research team aims to produce concrete evidence to help professionals, carers and adopters ensure that children have the best possible childhood and become happy, productive adults. It will focus on children who are first accommodated away from home by relatives, carers or adopters before the age of five. Using a range of methodologies, researchers will explore the experiences and outcomes for these children and identify what helps to ensure stability and security. “We know from our practice and research experience that, sometimes, the problems birth parents face are just too overwhelming to enable them to be the kind of parents they would like to be,” said Brigid Daniel, professor of social work at the University of Stirling. “In these cases, the children will be looked after by another member of the family or by foster carers. We owe it to these children, and to their birth parents, to ensure that they can all experience a good family life and receive the love and support that will allow them to flourish.”

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Viewed

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham