Gove receives ‘bad academia’ backlash

Academics have been making their voice heard on Twitter after education secretary Michael Gove mocked 100 university professors who had criticised his plans to reform the national curriculum.

March 22, 2013

The letter, published in the Daily Telegraph and the Independent on 19 March, warned that Mr Gove’s plans – which include pupils learning a language from the age of seven and mastering their multiplication times tables by the time they are nine – would put pressure on teachers to rely on rote learning.

“The learner is largely ignored. Little account is taken of children’s potential interests and capacities, or that young children need to relate abstract ideas to their experience, lives and activity,” it said.

But addressing a conference for headteachers in London yesterday, Mr Gove said the professors must think it a “tragedy” that he would “like children to learn things”.

“The impression is that it is Govey versus academia,” he said. “But there is good academia and bad academia.”

Mr Gove also antagonised education academics by saying he wanted to move away from universities determining how teacher training was delivered and detailed plans to commit more money to school-led instruction.

We used our twitter account to ask if there was any “bad academia” on your agenda. The response was immediate.

“I planned to work 1-to-1 with students on dissertations, but maybe I’ll just have them take a multiple-choice test,” tweeted Courtney Hopf, a learning developer at Brunel University, while University of Exeter history professor Richard Toye said: “I thought I might listen to some student presentations. How foolish, when I could be telling them what to think!”

Martin Eve, lecturer in English at the University of Lincoln, added: “Right, off to do some #badacademia. Or, as it’s occasionally known, critical thinking.”

And Victoria Dawson, a PhD student at De Montfort University’s International Centre for Sports History and Culture suggested that Gove might prefer her to regurgitate “what a middle aged bloke wrote 60 years ago” rather than undertaking some original research.

But as the replies came in, the Gove-supporting Twitter feed @toryeducation threatened to stoke the row further by mocking academics in a series of tweets.

“A GREAT thing about imminent MOOC creative destruction: A LOAD OF RUBBISH ‘SOCIAL SCIENCE’ ACADEMICS WILL BE UNEMPLOYED!” read one message.

chris.parr@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride