Speed Limits: Where Time Went and Why We Have So Little Left, by Mark Taylor

Howard P. Segal on an examination of the accelerating pace of life whose scope extends beyond fast food and computers

November 20, 2014

In our high-tech culture, speed is all the rage – not necessarily drugs (God forbid) but so much else: communications and transportation in endless forms. We are constantly reminded that our pace of change is unprecedented; that no prior society has ever approached ours in the ability to share instantaneously experiences, feelings, news and thoughts with intimates and strangers alike across the world.

No prior society, moreover, has approached our computer-based ability to analyse almost infinite amounts of data and to extract supposedly accurate conclusions about our varied values, views and behaviours. This in turn provides an allegedly reliable crystal ball with which to make predictions of crucial importance to policymakers in both the public and private sectors.

Philosopher and cultural critic Mark Taylor does not, however, rejoice. Far from it. He almost despairs. True, other scholars have written about the cultural implications of the accelerating pace of life in the 20th and early 21st centuries. Among these is Enda Duffy’s excellent The Speed Handbook: Velocity, Pleasure, Modernism, which I reviewed in these pages in 2009. Not cited by Taylor, this work starts with Aldous Huxley’s 1931 essay “Wanted: a New Pleasure”, which claimed “Speed…provides the one genuinely modern pleasure.” Since then, as Taylor might put it, the pleasure has been fleeting (no pun intended).

Despite this omission, Speed Limits does not commit the cardinal sin of largely ignoring the past common to such best-selling pop futurists as Alvin Toffler and Faith Popcorn. A prolific scholar, Taylor has done his homework in reading widely and deeply about past technological, economic, social, cultural and, yes, theological developments that bear on our current anxieties: the almost impossible challenge of living sanely and humanely amid relentless pressures to do nearly everything faster. Reassuringly, he understands that these trends did not begin in, say, 1990, and are not limited to, for instance, fast food and computers. Instead, they are rooted in the ideas of, among others, Martin Luther, John Calvin, Adam Smith, Søren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Frederick Winslow Taylor and Milton Friedman.

Yet Speed Limits makes its foremost contribution in its lucid and jargon-free synthesis of many others’ ideas rather than in its original points. Like Duffy, Taylor discusses the psychological impact in the 1800s of early trains upon passengers as their slower-paced world now sped by. Like Duffy, too, Taylor’s topics include literature, art, film, photography, fashion, advertising, news and politics. But Taylor goes much further in devoting many pages to a de facto grand narrative of how high-speed and high-volume financial markets epitomise the steady loss of human engagement; and of how traditional material products to buy and sell are being superseded in value by virtual assets and immaterial financial instruments that are ever faster to compute and to buy and sell.

Taylor draws on his own long career as an academic at Williams College and, more recently, at Columbia University to illustrate how past and present students and colleagues communicate with one another in classes and in written assignments. Rather than merely repeat the truism that today’s college students, even at the most prestigious institutions, generally do not read and write as well as their predecessors, Taylor illuminates the losses incurred by the growing substitution of online tools such as Google and Wikipedia for the good old days of sustained encounters with difficult texts that cannot be reduced to mere chunks and superficial summaries. Our obsession with speed undermines the life of the mind by reducing the enormous time required to grasp profound writings, and not just in college years. Faster, then, is not necessarily better.

Because Taylor is hardly an optimist – unlike those pop futurists who promise to save the world provided one buys their books and pays their lecture charges – he offers no panaceas. Paradoxically, he argues, only if people can change fast enough will an otherwise pending multifaceted meltdown be avoided. He pleads for the restoration of virtues that are no longer fashionable: patience, attention, deliberation, reflection and cooperation. He acknowledges modest evidence of these healthier habits.

Speed Limits is an insightful and provocative book that deserves the widest possible readership. But with one cautionary note: dear readers, please don’t rush through it.

Speed Limits: Where Time Went and Why We Have So Little Left

By Mark C. Taylor
Yale University Press, 408pp, £18.99
ISBN 9780300206470
Published 31 October 2014

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Assistant Recruitment - Human Resources Office

University Of Nottingham Ningbo China

Outreach Officer

Gsm London

Professorship in Geomatics

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Professor of European History

Newcastle University

Head of Department

University Of Chichester
See all jobs

Most Commented

men in office with feet on desk. Vintage

Three-quarters of respondents are dissatisfied with the people running their institutions

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

Humboldt University, Berlin

As the country succeeds in attracting even more students from overseas, a mixture of demographics, ‘soft power’ concerns and local politics help explain its policy

sitting by statue

Institutions told they have a ‘culture of excluding postgraduates’ in wake of damning study