Watchdog needed to assure integrity of UK research

The UK needs an independent regulator to oversee research integrity, a committee of MPs has concluded.

July 29, 2011

The Commons Science and Technology Committee makes the recommendation in its report on Peer Review in Scientific Publications, published yesterday.

The committee describes the current state of oversight of research integrity in the UK as “highly unsatisfactory”.

It accepts the view of Wellcome Trust director Sir Mark Walport, expounded during an evidence session, that primary responsibility for policing research integrity lies with researchers’ employers.

But the MPs argue that an external regulator is needed to “oversee the employer and make sure that they are doing the right thing”.

They say such a body would operate in a similar way to the Health and Safety Executive, which ensures that employers enforce health and safety laws.

“We recommend that the government sets out proposals on the scope and powers of such a regulator and consults with the research community and other relevant parties to develop them,” the report says.

It also calls on research institutions to appoint a specific member of staff to lead on research integrity, and to always publish the findings of any investigations into misconduct.

It urges funders to “revisit” their decision not to establish an independent advisory body to which research organisations and individuals could turn for advice on how to handle misconduct allegations. Such a move was recommended last year by the UK Research Integrity Futures Working Group, convened by Research Councils UK and Universities UK and chaired by former Keele University vice-chancellor Dame Janet Finch.

The MPs are also incredulous that no research council has ever withdrawn funding from a researcher on the grounds of fraud – particularly in the light of a 2002 survey by the National Institutes of Health in which around a third of US researchers admitted to having engaged in misconduct in the previous three years.

“We would have expected a similar proportion of researchers to be engaged in these misbehaviours in the UK,” they say. “We recommend that…funders of research reassess the robustness of their procedures for dealing with allegations of research fraud or misconduct, to ensure that they are not falling through the cracks”.

paul.jump@tsleducation.com

http://tinyurl.com/3vxjd7s

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry