University of Liverpool UCU vote to strike over pay threat

Action follows management decision to withhold pay from academics taking part in marking boycott

November 11, 2014

Union members at the University of Liverpool have voted to strike in response to the management’s decision to dock 100 per cent of the salary of employees participating in a marking boycott.

The strike, which would continue until the decision is rescinded, is the latest escalation of the dispute between institutions and staff which centres on proposed pension reforms.

At least eight institutions across the UK have now announced plans to deduct full pay from lecturers taking part in the boycott, which began on November 6.

A spokeswoman for the Liverpool branch of the University and College Union accused management of announcing their decision on pay in an “aggressively worded” email which “included threats to discipline members and make them personally liable for any damages awarded in claims made against the institution in relation to the industrial action”.

“This hard-line stance has caused real anger across the university,” the spokeswoman told Times Higher Education. “Not only is this an insult to staff here in Liverpool but it is a threat to the national union’s ability to use ASOS [action short of a strike] in the future. We also know that, if the University of Liverpool is allowed to get away with this kind of behaviour, that it will become a norm across the sector.”

The branch spokeswoman said the result of the vote was “overwhelming”, with no votes against and only one abstention.

The issue will now be considered by UCU headquarters, with the spokeswoman saying that authorisation to strike was expected to be “forthcoming”. With seven days’ notice required for a strike, the action is expected to begin towards the end of next week or early the following week.

The branch spokeswoman added: “The threats to our pensions are so vicious that action has to be taken. The University of Liverpool appears to be acting unreasonably and completely out of line with the rest of the HE sector.”

A Liverpool spokeswoman said the institution recognised the situation was “difficult for all concerned” but said the university was “disappointed” by the plan for further industrial action.

“We are committed to a nationally negotiated settlement…but we feel that this local action is premature and very damaging,” the spokeswoman said.

“The university does not accept the partial performance of any contract. The UCU’s marking boycott affects the very basis of the contract of employment, including fundamental duties of those staff involved in teaching.  

“If staff do not deliver assessments or meet marking deadlines this will seriously impact on students. The university therefore intends to deduct 100 per cent of pay for those taking part in industrial action.”

The spokeswoman added: “Our lines of communication with the UCU remain open.”

Action short of a strike at pre-92 institutions was backed by 87 per cent of voters in a nationwide UCU ballot triggered by the failure to reach agreement over proposed reforms to the Universities Superannuation Scheme.

UCU said it believed that other institutions withholding full pay from staff taking part in the boycott were Queen’s University Belfast, the University of East Anglia, the University of Surrey, Ulster University, University Campus Suffolk and University of Wales Trinity Saint David.

The University of York had announced that it would deduct full pay, but has since agreed to review that decision.

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

As an international student in the University of Liverpool, I decided to study here hoping for excellent learning experience. The uni has a great reputation internationally and with the amount of international tuition fee that I have to pay, this problem is a let down. I am not going to put any blame as I don't have a clear and objective information about the dispute. But however, I do feel disappointed and expect the people involved will sort it out soon.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

question marks PhD study

Selecting the right doctorate is crucial for success. Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman share top 10 tips on how to pick a PhD

India, UK, flag

Sir Keith Burnett reflects on what he learned about international students while in India with the UK prime minister

Pencil lying on open diary

Requesting a log of daily activity means that trust between the institution and the scholar has broken down, says Toby Miller

Application for graduate job
Universities producing the most employable graduates have been ranked by companies around the world in the Global University Employability Ranking 2016
Construction workers erecting barriers

Directly linking non-EU recruitment to award levels in teaching assessment has also been under consideration, sources suggest