Scientific excellence ‘at risk’ from Brexit

The UK’s leading role in shaping the future of science would be lost if voters choose to leave research ‘superpower’, pro-Remain voices warn

May 29, 2016
Forensic examiner inspecting broken shatterproof window
Source: Getty

Scientific excellence across the entire European Union will be damaged if the UK exits because Britons will not be able to shape the continent’s multibillion-pound research agenda towards funding the best projects, it has been warned.

Without the UK’s input into the direction of the EU’s research programme, worth about €16 billion (£12.3 billion) between 2014 and 2020 under Horizon 2020, science funding is far more likely to be allocated in a way that does not support absolute excellence, said Vivienne Stern, director of the UK Higher Education International Unit.


Work in a UK university? Take our EU referendum survey


Speaking at an event on the impact of the EU on science and education held at the UCL Institute of Education on 23 May, Ms Stern said that there was already much dismay among some EU countries that the UK was awarded far more in research funds than it contributed directly – largely because EU funding was awarded on the basis of excellence, rather than how much each country paid towards research programmes.

If there was a vote to leave the EU in the 23 June referendum, the UK would lose its voice in the ongoing excellence v equity debate – with funding more likely to tip towards a pork-barrel approach to funding, she said.

“The EU needs us to stay in otherwise the debate would be on the side of equity [over excellence],” said Ms Stern.

Mike Galsworthy, founder of Scientists for EU, agreed with Ms Stern’s comments, saying that Britain’s withdrawal from the EU would “pull a vital cog out of the machine” that is international research.

Without the UK’s central commitment to the EU, “Eastern European countries would be very resentful of us plundering talent from their countries”, as well as making a net gain from research funding, said Dr Galsworthy, a visiting researcher at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

He said it was clear that “given our size and position in Europe…we would need to make a net contribution [to research funding] and have freedom of movement…without having policy influence” to remain in the EU research framework in the event of Brexit.

“If we were to leave the EU, we would be pulling out our government and our 73 MEPs…and would have to appoint lobbyists to stand around in Brussels to lobby for us,” he said, adding that “this doesn’t sound very democratic or efficient”.

Dr Galsworthy said that the science superpower of the EU also made it possible to assemble the research “dream teams” that make up today’s cross-border collaborations.

“If there was no EU science programme, we would all run off to our respective governments, but a project might not suit smaller governments research streams or the timings would not match, which means [big projects] just wouldn’t happen,” he said.

“If you have various nations chipping into a common pot, you can put together the dream teams you want,” he explained.

jack.grove@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

It is outstanding website I love!

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Summer Receptionists

University Of Chichester

PhD fellow within Machine Learning for Personalized Healthcare

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Lecturer in Finance

Maynooth University

Teaching Laboratory Assistant

University Of Bristol
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Alexander Wedderburn

Former president of the British Psychological Society remembered

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham