Prevent 'stopping students speaking out in class'

New statutory duties designed to stop the rise of extremism on campus are making students and staff apprehensive, AUA conference hears

March 27, 2016
'Extremism' spelled out in letter blocks on jigsaw

New rules to combat extremism in UK universities are inhibiting students from talking freely in seminars, a conference has been told.

Adrian Lee, an academic quality officer at the University of York, said that his institution was “already having reports of students…feeling apprehensive about what they can and cannot say” in class since new Prevent duties took effect in September.

Speaking in a debate over the impact on campus of new counter-terrorism measures at the Association of University Administrators’ annual conference in Leeds on 22 March, Dr Lee said that universities should do more to clarify guidelines about when students would be reported to authorities over their views.

“Universities need to think about complying with regulations, but also how students understand them,” he said.

Gavin Barber, head of student central at Oxford Brookes University, told the debate how some staff were now apprehensive about approving the potentially controversial titles of master's dissertations.

Many administrators did not feel sufficiently equipped to undertake the specialist task of identifying potential extremists, something normally undertaken by the security services, Mr Barber added.

“I feel no more comfortable asking [staff] to carry out this policy than I would asking them to pilot a helicopter or undertake brain surgery,” he said.

Speaking from the panel, Martin McQuillan, pro vice-chancellor (research) at Kingston University, described Prevent as “badly framed legislation based on moral panic”.

Its implementation relied on having a “proscribed list of speakers that no one is willing to admit exists”, said Professor McQuillan.

However, Dusty Amroliwala, deputy vice-chancellor at the University of East London, said that the Prevent duties were reasonable and universities should be willing to take a position on speakers with bigoted or extreme views seeking to talk on campus.

He also raised the case of an UEL academic who reported their concerns regarding a student who had changed the way they dressed and started talking about travelling to Syria.

“That academic was really concerned about that student not only because of Prevent, but because they wanted something to be done,” said Mr Amroliwala.

Delegates at the AUA conference voted by roughly two to one in support of the debate's motion that Prevent duties "endanger freedom of expression and contribute to a long-term decline in academic liberty".

jack.grove@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Related universities

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham