Overseas students in Australia face ‘unequal’ support packages

While universities commit hundreds of millions of dollars to help domestic and foreign students, dissatisfaction remains

April 21, 2020
Assistance on climb

Long treated as second-class citizens in Australia, international students are now bristling at inequities in the multimillion-dollar hardship packages bankrolled by universities.

With the government excluding foreign students from taxpayer-funded coronavirus assistance schemes, universities have shouldered the responsibility themselves. Almost all have unveiled funds for students affected by the pandemic, open to local and international students alike.

Assistance ranges from food hampers and short-term loans to grants of up to A$7,500 (£3,800). Most universities offer emergency payments to students affected by job losses or border closures, with many launching philanthropic appeals to complement institutional contributions.

While few universities have specified the sums they are committing to these funds, exceptions include Deakin (up to A$25 million), Monash and the University of Technology Sydney (A$15 million each), Flinders (A$12.5 million) and RMIT and the University of South Australia (A$10 million each).

But while these funds are likely to dispense hundreds of millions of dollars, some international students are unsatisfied. Grievances include payment delays and a lack of tuition fee discounts for those forced to study online.

Most hardship funds do not provide broad tuition fee waivers, with some specifically ruling them out. Exceptions include Western Sydney University, which offers foreigners a 10 per cent fee reduction, while private Bond University is cutting both domestic and international students’ fees by 20 per cent.

Some universities have also reduced fees for Chinese students, who were the first affected by the crisis. Australia banned direct entry from China almost seven weeks before it closed its border to visitors from most other countries.

For weeks, Chinese students were permitted to enter Australia provided they had spent at least a fortnight outside their homeland. Some universities offered them tuition discounts to compensate for the additional travel costs.

A European student at the University of Sydney said these discounts should now be extended to other nationalities, given that all students had now been forced online. He said distance education was inferior to face-to-face study and offered a more limited subject selection. Two units he had intended to study had been cancelled without notice, he said.

“This is unequal treatment,” the student said. “By granting a discount to some international students, universities admit that the current mode of study is not worth the same tuition fees. Universities are not fulfilling their contractual performance towards us.”

The University of Sydney said it had offered a rebate to international students who had been unable to reach Australia by 30 March, and who would consequently need to undertake an additional semester.

A spokeswoman said Sydney had “established a broader set of support packages to cover a wider range of issues” when the coronavirus crisis had forced it to stop face-to-face teaching in the last week of March. “We’ve introduced a suite of support measures for all our students, from financial assistance to technological and mental well-being support and more.”

She said online classes offered the same curriculum as face-to-face delivery, taught by the same staff, in classes that supported collaboration and interactivity wherever possible.

An executive from another university, who asked not to be named, said most universities steered clear of fee discounts for fear of encouraging a “race to the bottom” in which institutions sacrificed quality to remain competitive.

He said converting to online delivery had cost universities more than running regular courses, and distance education offered students the same qualifications and connections as on-campus teaching.

“If you’re suffering hardship, we’ve got millions of dollars to help you,” he said. “We understand we have a responsibility to help students, but we’re doing that by focusing on the students who need it – not the noisy ones who want it.”

john.ross@timeshighereducation.com

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Related articles

Reader's comments (4)

Do you honestly feel the Australian taxpayer should support no Australian citizens or permanent residents. Put it out in the public arena .I am sure as long as Apple's fall from a tree the majority would not approve.
Australian permanent residents are not eligible for HECS and are required to pay for fees up front unlike Australian nationals. If you do not want to support your third largest exported industry that brings money to Australia, no problem. International students can study in other western countries that offer a higher quality of education.
Australian permanent residents are not eligible for HECS and are required to pay for fees up front unlike Australian nationals. If you do not want to support Australia's third largest industry that brings money to Australia, international students can study in other western countries.
Majority of these students are in dubious private colleges that do not have classrooms and instructors and which prosecutions you get to hear about from time to time. They have faked their home country credentials including finances, faked their class attendance here, faked their skills level here and faked their working hour certificate here for the purpose of claiming immigration and immigration only. It’s very simple, you just have to read their public discussion posts that are freely available online in reddit etc. and you will realise their real purpose was and is a backdoor entry to this country. Fake marriages visa became such an issue in the state of Punjab in India that all such visa issuance has stopped. Recently herald sun reported marriage visa rackets and how bridging visa was used in bad faith. You argument is on thin ice? Because the people who you are espousing have indulged in criminal practice to dupe authorities here?

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Sponsored

Featured jobs