Heavenly low-exhaust cars: THE exam howlers competition

Malapropisms fuel the nominations for the best of this year’s exam bloopers

July 10, 2014

Source: Getty

Car-dinal: one submission spoke of cars fitted with ‘Catholic converters’

If Da Vinci Code author Dan Brown is looking for a new sinister Vatican plot for his next novel, he need look no further than this year’s Times Higher Education exam howlers competition.

“In future all cars [will] be fitted with Catholic converters”, wrote one student at the University of Ulster in a paper on vehicle emissions.

That submission came from John Milliken, lecturer in education, who was also amused by another student’s claim that “the [hole in the] ozone layer was caused by arseholes”.

“He probably meant aerosols, but then…maybe not,” said Dr Milliken, one of the many academics who relayed the funniest student bloopers from this summer’s marking season.

One topical malapropism was entered by Verity Brack, information technology programme director at the University of Sheffield, after a student wrote that Google was “one of the two main suppositories of data in the world”.

Meanwhile, Josephine Kelly, a lecturer in business and government at Aston University, was intrigued to read that the coalition government had a “toff stance on tax avoidance”. On second glance, “toff” was actually “tuff” (tough), she noted – but maybe the former was more accurate.

There was also a new interpretation of London’s thriving social scene in the 18th century in a paper on the creation of the Spectator publication in 1711. “Within these coffeehouses, men from all different parts of the world could interfere with each other”, wrote a student in a paper marked by Andrew Rudd, lecturer in English literature at the University of Exeter.

Modern history was equally troublesome for a first year at the University of Southampton. According to Suzanne Reimer, senior lecturer in geography, the student observed that “globalisation has led to a growing interconnectedness between small-scale people and larger-scale cities across the globe” – probably a welcome benefit for those under 5ft tall.

But some entries fell into the simply “bizarre” category.

Britta Osthaus, senior lecturer in psychology at Canterbury Christ Church University, who teaches a course on the mental capacities of animals, was surprised to read that “octopuses are intelligent because they have been found to be able to predict the winners of football matches during the World Cup”, a reference to Paul the Octopus, the cephalopod that “predicted” results in the 2010 tournament.

And no exam howlers competition would be complete without a Second World War clanger. Alix Green, lecturer in history at the University of Hertfordshire, was baffled to hear that “Hitler’s role in the Second World War is often overlooked”.

The winning entry will be announced in next week’s THE.

jack.grove@tsleducation.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Viewed

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi