Grant winners – 18 February 2016

A round-up of recent recipients of research council cash

February 18, 2016
Grant winners tab on folder

Royal Academy of Engineering / Lloyd’s Register Foundation

Research Fellowships

Advanced micro-optofluidic portable sensing (AMPS) technology for timely point-of-care diagnostics


Adjoint-based approaches in thermo-acoustics: understanding, modelling and controlling instabilities


Royal Society

Wolfson Research Merit Awards

These awards are worth £10,000-£30,000 a year, which is a salary enhancement

Principles and practice of near data computing (NDC)


Stage differentiation in malaria parasites


Sources and impacts of short-lived atmospheric halogens


Instability in geometry


Leverhulme Trust

Research Project Grants
Sciences

Biological photovoltaic cells in ultra-small volumes


  • Award winner: Emily Nurse
  • Institution: University College London
  • Value: £288,386

A novel technique to search for dark matter at the Large Hadron Collider


  • Award winner: Simon Belt
  • Institution: Plymouth University
  • Value: £164,557

A novel proxy for reconstructing polar ocean temperatures


  • Award winner: Olmo Silva
  • Institution: London School of Economics
  • Value: £234,029

A randomised controlled trial to identify the causal effect of accelerator programmes


The cartography of computational search spaces


In detail

Award winner: Malcolm Gaskill
Institution: University of East Anglia
Value: £249,524

Inner Lives: Emotions, Identity and the Supernatural, 1300–1900

This project will investigate how, between 1300 and 1900, “our ancestors understood themselves and their environments, both seen and unseen”, according to principal investigator Malcolm Gaskill, professor of early modern history at the University of East Anglia. “We’re focusing in particular on the supernatural, and ways in which people once used emotions to communicate with invisible forces in the three interconnected contexts of the home, the community and the cosmos,” he said. “One of the main motivations was a desire to bring together historians of the medieval, early modern and modern periods, so that we could study long-term continuity and change. Historians often work within quite small timeframes, which tends to limit this kind of cultural history.” Professor Gaskill added that the team hoped to establish “some kind of model or common methodology applicable to the three periods and research areas” that will advance historical understanding of inner lives, especially the practical use of emotions.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Sponsored