Grant winners – 10 September 2015

A round-up of recent recipients of research council cash

September 10, 2015
Grant Winners header

European Research Council

Uncertainty, risk and inequality: the role of macroeconomic policies and institutions


National Institute for Health Research

Health Technology Assessment Programme

The pragmatic ischaemic thrombectomy evaluation (PISTE) trial – main phase: a randomised controlled trial of mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke


ALTAR: alternative to prophylactic antibiotics for the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections in women


Public Health Research Programme

A cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the GoActive programme to increase physical activity among 13- to 14-year-old adolescents


Royal Society

Wolfson Research Merit Awards

These awards are worth £10,000-£30,000 a year, which is a salary enhancement

How does social evolution generate biodiversity?


Discrete structures and randomness


Medical Research Council

Research grants

Role of growth factors of the TGFbeta superfamily in aberrant follicle development in polycystic ovary syndrome


High resolution systems biology to determine the role of gut microbiota on Type 2 diabetes


In detail

Award winner: Alex O’Neill
Institution: University of Leeds
Value: £249,823

‘Silent’ antibiotic resistance genes: an overlooked issue of considerable importance in antibacterial chemotherapy?

Antibiotics’ utility is decreasing as bacteria evolve to resist their effects, with antibiotic resistance now considered one of the three greatest threats to human health. A crucial aspect of addressing this problem is “strategic intelligence” – having current information about the proportion, in a given location, of bacterial strains resistant to particular antibiotics. This allows doctors to decide which antibiotics are best to use routinely to treat bacterial infection, and to avoid those that will probably be ineffective owing to resistance. This project will focus on investigating the phenomenon of “silencing of antibiotic resistance by mutation” (SARM) that may be undermining strategic intelligence on antibiotic resistance. Recent work has discovered that some bacteria that are sensitive to antibiotics nonetheless carry genes normally associated with antibiotic resistance, but that these genes have become switched off (“silenced”). This is deeply concerning, as bacteria with SARM would appear susceptible to an antibiotic when tested, but could then become resistant during patient treatment. Focusing on the “superbug” Staphylococcus aureus, the project aims to investigate how widespread SARM is among bacteria and how it occurs.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham