Canadian Tory leader’s election attack on academics raises alarm

Lecturers’ union fears Andrew Scheer is portraying universities as left-wing ‘indoctrination centres’, with potentially damaging consequences

September 20, 2019

The attack by Canadian Conservative party leader Andrew Scheer on university professors, while not likely to be taken seriously by voters, suggests a long-term threat deserving greater attention, faculty leaders have warned.

The critique took the form of Scheer campaign posters on the York University campus in Toronto promoting his candidacy with the slogan: “Because you can only hear the same left-wing talking points from your professors so many times.”

Mr Scheer has said that the posters were meant to be humorous and did not indicate any intent – if he becomes prime minister after the 21 October election – to attempt to dictate faculty appointments.

Leaders of Canadian faculty said they recognised the posters as an attempt to excite a relatively small audience of conservative voters. But they noted Mr Scheer also has a track record of promoting US-style campus “free speech” policies aimed at forcing institutions to host speakers known more for provocation and threats of violence than reasoned debate and exchange.

“I don’t think it was a joke,” said David Robinson, executive director of the Canadian Association of University Teachers. “It fits into their very stereotypical and frankly untrue vision of universities and colleges as somehow these indoctrination centres that are intolerant of conservative views.”

Mr Scheer has largely followed the lead of US president Donald Trump – who has signed an executive order on campus free speech – using the suggestion of a free speech crisis on university campuses as a politically potent issue to help him win the Conservative Party leadership in May 2017. The premier of Ontario, Doug Ford, later introduced a law tying university funding to compliance with free speech policies.

The tactics are “straight from the Republican playbook” in the US, said James L. Turk, a predecessor of Mr Robinson at CAUT and now a visiting scholar and director of the Centre for Free Expression at Ryerson University.

Professor Turk said he was confident that Canadians ultimately would be less receptive to such rhetoric. “I'm always on the lookout for the least sign that this way of thinking is growing in Canada,” he said. “But I really think that there's not much indication this is going very far.”

Mr Robinson was less definitive, describing himself as caught between a desire “to ignore this kind of nonsense” and a recognition that political attempts to dictate debate on university campuses can be “very very dangerous”.

But more substantive, at least for the moment, Mr Robinson said, is the very real concern among universities that a Conservative victory next month could slow federal investment in their research budgets.

And, while provincial governments set overall budgets and tuition rates at universities, they stand to be affected by Mr Scheer’s proposal that the federal government encourage private savings accounts for education. His plan, announced this week, would boost the federal contribution to Registered Education Savings Plans from 20 per cent to 30 per cent for every dollar invested, up to C$2,500 (£1,500) a year.

While that may seem helpful to students, Mr Robinson said, the RESP programme is largely used by people in higher-income brackets. A greater reliance on such accounts, especially if it helps supplant Canada’s traditional emphasis on low rates of tuition fees, could drive up student debt rates, he said.

paul.basken@timeshighereducation.com

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

相关文章

Reader's comments (3)

Get over it. It's free speech not hate speech. Violence on campus predominantly a results of activists against free speech.
ddz is absolutely right about the activists, too many times their foot-soldiers don't even know who or what they are protesting about. As we're talking about Canada the attacks on Jordan Peterson are a prime example of such "PC-authoritarianism" driven left-wing unknowing idiocy, even a documentary film about him and his rise to academic fame, or infamy depending on your viewpoint, is having problems: https://www.thestar.com/entertainment/movies/2019/09/18/jordan-peterson-documentary-shut-out-of-toronto-cinema-say-filmmakers.html Anyone who thinks they can effect a change in the lefty world of Canadian academia to make it more centralist however is sadly mistaken, several Canadian friends in that world dare not speak the truth but have to acquiesce to the prevalent "PC-authoritarianism" in the world place, lest they be found unacceptable and cast out following the usual thorough vilification. One who did dare at McMaster ended up on the scrap heap at 49 years of age. As to the politicians, Scheer v Trudeau looks like the usual choices, best worst, though Justins continued entitled gropey manhandling and manipulation of women won't do him any favours with a lot of Canadians, of either political persuasion.
Thank you for this post it really helped me. Keep it up. https://islamiclives24.blogspot.com/2019/08/rights-of-children-in-islam-child-in_29.html

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October