Vince Cable: universities will be ‘main casualties’ of Brexit

Former minister in charge of higher education says Theresa May could have won single market concessions 

January 24, 2017
Vince Cable
Source: University of Nottingham

Universities will be the “main casualties” of the UK leaving the European Union, according to former business secretary Vince Cable.

Speaking to Times Higher Education the day after Theresa May outlined her plans for Brexit, Dr Cable also predicted that universities will probably lose the funding that they get through participation in EU research programmes, despite the prime minister hinting that the government would make remaining in them a key goal of the exit negotiations.

“Universities are going to be the main casualties of [coming out of the EU],” he said. “One [problem] is the loss of overseas students. They will [also] lose Horizon [2020 funding]. Theresa May said yesterday that she wants to keep that, but we’ll see.

“Third, there’s the insecurity of the European staff, of whom there are large numbers. Universities are worrying themselves silly with this, with good reason.”

Dr Cable also raised concerns about Ms May’s plan to remove the UK from the European single market, suggesting that it could have been possible to make a deal around the free movement of people that would have benefited universities given that other countries had “cherry-picked” on single market rules themselves in the past.

“I spent five years negotiating single market policy over things [such as] the recognition of professions,” he said. “So, if you’re a doctor, can your qualification be accepted through[out] the EU? The Germans would not accept it. They would not accept free movement applying to professional qualifications, they just opted out, they cherry-picked. Something the British are accused of doing.”

Dr Cable made the comments while speaking about a new massive open online course (Mooc) that he has led on designing, entitled The Politics of Economics and The Economics of Politicians.

He said that his motivation to set up the course, which is being hosted on FutureLearn – the Open University’s social learning platform – in conjunction with the University of Nottingham, came about through his fascination over the link between academic economists and politics, and how ideas are translated into policy.

When asked whether governments had placed too much importance on economists, Dr Cable said that he didn’t “buy the proposition” that economic arguments were “no longer valid”. He added that comments made during the EU referendum campaign that the nation had had enough of “experts” were “very stupid”.

“Clearly, most people do respect the views of scientists [and] doctors,” he said. “I know [that Donald] Trump is challenging climate change, but for the most part we do accept that if scientific and medical research comes up with evidence, most people trust those people. Even economics, in its rigorous sense, is still respected, I think. We [had] ‘experts’ in the department to advise me, and I took the view that we should listen to them.”

john.elmes@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham