V-cs highlight benefits of EU membership ahead of elections

Open letter from UUK board members points to research funding and mobility as being ‘central’ to success

May 19, 2014

Vice-chancellors representing the whole UK university sector have signed a letter in a national newspaper saying membership of the European Union is “central” to their institutions’ success.

Three days before the European elections, in which the United Kingdom Independence Party is predicted to poll highly, the open letter published today says that UK universities benefit from £1.2 billion in EU research funding every year.

This funding “supports UK-based research and transnational research projects which pool knowledge to solve social and economic challenges in a way that no country acting alone could do”, argue the 23 vice-chancellors currently on the Universities UK board.

“EU programmes facilitate the mobility of researchers, staff and students, providing opportunities for young people and contributing to the excellence of our research base,” the letter, published in The Times, says.

“Without an influential voice in the development of EU policy, the UK would lose its ability to influence policy affecting research and higher education. As university leaders, we are committed to ensuring that these benefits of EU membership to the British people and to our universities are properly understood, and that our voices are heard in the debate about EU reform,” it concludes.

In a separate development, a Europe-wide network of research intensive universities including Oxford, Cambridge and Imperial College London has issued a call for changes to the EU’s research agenda following the European elections.

In particular, the League of European Research Universities wants the social sciences and humanities (SSH) to be better included in the European research area.

“Too often the advancement of knowledge is focused on technological innovations, ignoring the fundamental contributions delivered by SSH,” it says in a statement.

The league also suggests a comment framework for research misconduct, including “the development of, for example, common principles or standards, codes of conduct, handling of misconduct allegations and authorship, which may or may not exist to varying degrees at the national and institutional levels”.

david.matthews@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Researcher in the Marine UAS-project

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

PhD Position within Marine Structures

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

PhD Position in Biogas-Hydrogen

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu
See all jobs

Most Commented

Doctoral study can seem like a 24-7 endeavour, but don't ignore these other opportunities, advise Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Matthew Brazier illustration (9 February 2017)

How do you defeat Nazis and liars? Focus on the people in earshot, says eminent Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt

Improvement, performance, rankings, success

Phil Baty sets out why the World University Rankings are here to stay – and why that's a good thing

Warwick vice-chancellor Stuart Croft on why his university reluctantly joined the ‘flawed’ teaching excellence framework