REF ‘leads to short-term research approach’

German academic looking at UK system raises concerns over incentives created by research excellence framework

March 4, 2016
Pocket watch
Source: iStock

The UK’s research excellence framework (REF) discourages more innovative research and encourages a short-term approach to scholarship, according to a German academic looking at its impact on academia.  

Len Ole Schäfer, a PhD student in sociology at the University of Bamberg, said that his research had come to the conclusion that academic performance assessment means that “long-term speculative work is likely to be inhibited and short-termism is encouraged”.

“The literature suggests that there are innovation-hindering effects which reduce academic performance and diversity, and lead to a concentration of resources,” he told academics at the UCL Institute of Education on 3 March.

As well as looking at existing research, Mr Schäfer also interviewed a series of UK academics, some of whom had raised concerns that exercises such as the REF encourage universities to poach star researchers just in time to boost their score, which disrupts longer-term research endeavours.

Although his sample size is small – Mr Schäfer interviewed about half a dozen academics at a research-intensive university – his findings chime with other concerns raised about the incentives created by the REF.

Lord Stern of Brentford, president of the British Academy, is currently leading a review into the assessment.

In a letter to Times Higher Education in 2014 written jointly with Sir Paul Nurse, chief executive of the Francis Crick Institute, he asked: “Are researchers feeling pressured to adopt short-term horizons and a narrow focus, and chasing publication rather than following their own judgements on which are the most fruitful avenues for research and most likely to yield major outcomes?”

“Is the REF incentivisation of universities to hire stars in the closing months, like an imminent transfer deadline in the Premier League, really a way to build a long-term scholarly department?” the letter added.

His report is expected by the summer. 

david.matthews@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham