Lincoln breaks away from NUS after Bouattia election

SU leader ‘no longer felt confident’ that national union represented views of students

May 10, 2016
Malia Bouattia, National Union of Students (NUS), speaking to crowd
Source: Alamy

The University of Lincoln Students’ Union has become the first to break away from the National Union of Students following the election of Malia Bouattia (pictured) as national president.

ULSU president Hayley Jayne Wilkinson said that she “no longer felt confident that the NUS represented the views of our students” in the wake of a referendum in which 881 of the 1,734 voters backed disaffiliation, and 804 supported continued membership.

Ms Bouattia’s victory over serving president Megan Dunn represented a significant step to the left for the NUS, and there are campaigns to disaffiliate under way at a number of other institutions, with students at Newcastle University and the University of Exeter due to vote in referendums this week.

Ms Bouattia faced allegations of anti-Semitism during her election campaign – something that she vehemently denied – and her support for controversial advocacy group Cage has also drawn criticism.

Following the referendum, the ULSU will disaffiliate from the NUS on 31 December.

“For ULSU, our priority is our members and what they tell us matters to them in today’s rapidly changing higher education environment,” Ms Wilkinson said. “Put simply, this debate has been about what students want from the organisation that represents them nationally, and for some time, we have felt that the focus of debate within the NUS has been far removed from the issues that our students tell us are important to them every day on campus.”

Ms Dunn said that she was “disappointed” by the ULSU decision, particularly as it was based on such a narrow victory margin in a referendum that attracted the participation of 13 per cent of Lincoln students.

She said that while the ULSU would save £31,831 in affiliation fees, it would lose £153,024 with no NUS funds being reinvested in the union, prices going up on campus as a result of the loss of shared purchasing, and students losing their NUS Extra cards.

“Our door will always be open to Lincoln students’ union should students wish to affiliate again,” Ms Dunn said. “Now, more than ever, students need and deserve a strong, united movement to ensure we continue to work to get the best deal for students.”

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Related universities

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Lincoln and Newcastle break away from NUS after Bouattia election

Reader's comments (1)

I'm not sure why Ms Dunn was invovled in the debate having been ousted for office some weeks previously. I'm also not sure why 87% didn't vote, but the answer is probably that they didn't and don't care in which case you have to question the value and relevance of NUS affiliation anyway.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

question marks PhD study

Selecting the right doctorate is crucial for success. Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman share top 10 tips on how to pick a PhD

India, UK, flag

Sir Keith Burnett reflects on what he learned about international students while in India with the UK prime minister

Pencil lying on open diary

Requesting a log of daily activity means that trust between the institution and the scholar has broken down, says Toby Miller

Application for graduate job
Universities producing the most employable graduates have been ranked by companies around the world in the Global University Employability Ranking 2016
Retired academics calculating moves while playing bowls

Lincoln Allison, Eric Thomas and Richard Larschan reflect on the ‘next phase’ of the scholarly life