Janet Beer: ministers should not publicly criticise university teaching

University of Liverpool vice-chancellor says remarks harm UK’s global reputation

October 8, 2015
Janet Beer University of Liverpool

The UK is in danger of “shooting ourselves in both feet” when leaders criticise the quality of university teaching in public, a senior academic has claimed.

Janet Beer, vice-chancellor at the University of Liverpool, said universities need to pay “rigorous attention to the quality of what happens in our lecture halls” but it “does not do us any good reputationally when we beat ourselves up in public”.

Speaking at a conference on transnational education hosted by Universities UK and the UK Higher Education International Unit, Professor Beer said: “When our minister describes the quality of some of our lectures as ‘lamentable’, it is not a great moment for higher education.”

Last month universities minister Jo Johnson claimed in a speech at UUK’s annual conference that “lamentable teaching” is damaging the reputation of British higher education.

Professor Beer added: “There is some brilliant stuff going on at universities in this country, and indeed some very creative and inventive pedagogy in overseas contexts.

“The expectation of students is quite rightly growing. I’m not saying all teaching is good; by no means am I saying that.

“We need to pay very rigorous attention to the quality of what happens in our lecture halls, seminar rooms and tutorials, but it does not do us any good reputationally when we beat ourselves up in public, which we seem to do on a reasonably regular basis.”

Meanwhile, Troy Heffernan, professor of transnational education and international director of Plymouth Business School at Plymouth University, said that as the competition for transnational education increases, so too will the tension between profitability and quality.

“There is a real tension, I’m finding, between profitability of the operation and the quality of the operation. Quality is key,” he said.

He advised universities involved with transnational education to ensure they have a full understanding of the Quality Assurance Agency code in this area and “examine” potential international partners “at an early stage”.

“The DNA has to be right on both sides. Ask, is it of benefit to your university? Is it of benefit to their institution? And will students come? You must answer yes to all three.”

ellie.bothwell@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

And in other news the British Tourist Authority has urged ministers not to refer to "saving for a rainy day" as it reinforces negative impressions of the UK's weather.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham