George Osborne warned by UUK president over cuts

George Osborne “must step back” from forcing cuts “that will cause such damage to universities”, the Universities UK president has warned.

January 24, 2014

Sir Christopher Snowden, the University of Surrey vice-chancellor, urged the chancellor not go ahead with scrapping the £322 million student opportunity fund that supports the poorest students.

The Treasury is reportedly pushing for the fund to be scrapped, as it forces the Department for Business Innovation and Skills to make cuts to atone for an overspend.

For the UUK president to warn against cuts to student opportunity funding may be significant. The Russell Group of research-intensive universities, whose institutions gain only small amounts of the funding, has not offered any public support for the funding stream – instead seeking to defend the research budget against potential cuts.

“Just as other countries are increasing their direct contribution to funding universities, the coalition government is thinking about doing the opposite,” says Sir Christopher, writing in the Daily Telegraph in an article that appeared online this afternoon.

The UUK president blames the hole in BIS’s budget on the department’s “miscalculations about the costs of uncontrolled expansion by private (including for-profit) higher education institutions”.

He adds: “This has been exacerbated by higher than expected spending on grants for students from low-income backgrounds – because universities have been surprisingly successful in attracting them.”

Sir Christopher calls student opportunity funding, which supports access and retention for groups such as disadvantaged or disable students, “a smart use of public money”.

He adds: “We know that about a third of productivity growth between 1994 and 2005 was due to the growth of graduate skills in the labour force. Our economy needs more skilled graduates from a wider range of backgrounds. So it would be economically short sighted to reduce support for teaching low-income students.”

On other potential cuts to remaining direct funding for teaching, Sir Christopher says: “There is also a threat to support for high cost subjects and other essential, targeted funding.”

He concludes: “Economic growth will be the most important issue in the forthcoming general election. The chancellor must step back from forcing the business department to go through with decisions that will cause such damage to universities.”

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham