Commission report calls for private sector regulation

Private providers, including universities’ own offshoots, have been pinpointed as a major risk to English higher education in a new report.

October 8, 2013

The report by the Higher Education Commission, published tomorrow, warns that “proper regulation” of the sector is needed to capture all higher education providers. It appears to highlight the risks posed not just by unknown new providers, but by private subsidiary colleges set up by universities.

England’s funding council has previously warned that such offshoots could evade requirements to take part in Key Information Sets and subscribe to the Quality Assurance Agency.

“New market entrants are not facing the scrutiny they should, takeovers and complex corporate structures are being used to evade fundamental protections for students, and institutions are facing more pressure than ever to recruit students and crucially, therefore, bring in funding,” says the report, titled Regulating higher education: protecting students, encouraging innovation, enhancing excellence.

At present, unlike publicly-funded universities, private providers are not required to undergo full institutional review by the QAA (except for the small number with degree awarding powers) or to subscribe to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator.

The report, co-authored by Conservative peer Lord Norton of Louth and Roger King, former vice-chancellor of the University of Lincoln, says that this growing “unregulated” private sector “has the potential to damage England’s reputation as a leading provider of higher education”.

The failure of even small private providers and resulting damage to students could have a negative impact on the standing of the entire sector overseas, it argues.

Lord Norton told Times Higher Education that one of the motivations behind the report was that there are “so many new providers coming into the field”, without regulators knowing “who they all are and what they are doing”.

The report recommends that all higher education providers be forced to subscribe to a common regulatory framework, enforced by a new Council for Higher Education.

The council, a new chief regulator for the sector that would build on the powers of the Higher Education Funding Council for England, would include a new Office for Competition and Institutional Diversity, focused on private providers including universities’ private offshoots.

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Capsized woman and boat

Early career academics can be left to sink or swim when navigating the choppy waters of learning scholarly writing. Helen Sword says a more formal, communal approach can help everyone, especially women

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan