Chinese students lack critical thinking ‘due to propaganda’

Interviews with MA students in UK suggest that although few agree with Chinese government line, compulsory courses dull development of independent thought

February 10, 2016
Two women take a selfie with Chinese flags
Source: Corbis
Passive targets? Study finds party doctrine erodes ability to think independently

Chinese students at Western universities are often seen as lacking critical thinking skills – and China’s supposedly authority-revering traditional culture often gets the blame.

But this view has been challenged by research from a Chinese-born scholar who believes that students’ failure to think independently is just as likely due to Communist Party propaganda during education rather than any deeply ingrained cultural difference.

Tao Zhang, a lecturer at Nottingham Trent University, interviewed 16 Chinese students studying for master’s degrees in journalism and media at her university.

While most were unconvinced by the party line in undergraduate-level propaganda, Dr Zhang argues it nonetheless erodes their ability to think independently.

In addition to their own discipline, Chinese undergraduates have to study four compulsory topics: Marxism; Mao Zedong Thought; modern Chinese history; and “moral, legal and civic education”.

The textbooks for these subjects “treat students as passive targets of political-ideological propaganda” and deprive them of the chance to “develop their critical disposition and exercise rational thinking and reasoning”, according to “Why do Chinese postgraduates struggle with critical thinking? – some clues from the higher education curriculum in China”, provisionally accepted by the Journal of Further and Higher Education.

Asked what they understood by critical thinking, one student told Dr Zhang: “It was new to us. We did not hear of it in China and find it very difficult. We have no idea of how to be critical and critical of what."

In the UK, “you need to present evidence and references to support your views and we did not have to do that in China”, they added.

Three-quarters of the students interviewed said that they had ignored the content of the propaganda and only studied it to pass their exams. However, two of those Dr Zhang spoke to said that it had deeply influenced their thinking.

“I can construct an analysis but the end always has a positive outlook and a slogan like this: ‘China is good, socialism is good’. It can’t be negative,” they explained. But they said that they were now aware of an alternative way of thinking.

Two others had actively rejected the propaganda, and said that they were aware of how their history textbook omitted to mention the Tiananmen Square massacre of 1989.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments


Print headline: Critical thinking skills stymied by ‘propaganda’

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Organisation Design Specialist UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN (UCD)
Dean of Health and Social Care STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY
Dean of Engineering and Creative Arts STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY
Dean of Law, Policing and Forensics STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY
Lecturer in Composition DURHAM UNIVERSITY

Most Commented

University of Oxford students walking on campus

University of Oxford snatches top spot from Caltech in this year’s World University Rankings as Asia’s rise continues

Home secretary says government will support 'best' universities

Man handing microphone to audience member

Academic attainment of disadvantaged students can be improved if they can decide how they are assessed, study claims

Italy's gold medallist

New measures to ensure universities are ‘not penalised’ for taking poorer students also outlined for next stage of TEF

Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir meeting over coffee

Claims for genius require more than repeated assertion to make the case, says Martin Cohen