Check your privilege, academics told

Warwick sociologist urges scholars to let go of their ‘sense of injury’ if they want to resist marketisation

July 3, 2014

Source: www2.warwick.ac.uk

Academics must address their own “privilege” rather than constantly focus on a “sense of injury” if they want to properly resist the marketisation of higher education.

That is the view of Gurminder Bhambra, professor of sociology at the University of Warwick, who told a conference last week that many scholars had buried their heads in the sand over government reforms.

Speaking at the Governing Academic Life conference held at the London School of Economics and the British Library, Professor Bhambra said that academics’ awareness of the changes since the Browne Review of 2010 had gone through three stages: first, “It’s complex and needs more research (funding)”, then “I need to concentrate on my research” and finally “What’s happening? Why didn’t anyone tell me?”

While those without qualifications “remain strongly committed to ideals of public higher education and its public funding”, continued Professor Bhambra, “we – tenured academics – allowed our mouths to be stuffed with gold and largely remained silent as government ministers, university vice-chancellors and many of our colleagues worked out how to make the best of the new situation”. Effective resistance, meanwhile, would require them to “address our privilege rather than our sense of injury”.

Meanwhile, Wendy Brown, class of 1936 first professor of political science at the University of California, Berkeley, argued that a system of faculty as “the managers of the academic side of the house” had been superseded by an environment where “in no meaningful sense do faculty now govern the university or their work as teachers and researchers”. She also said that students’ “indifference to the status as opposed to effectiveness and entertainment value of faculty reinforces the casualisation of academic labour”.

The conference, held to mark the 30th anniversary of the death of philosopher Michel Foucault, also considered how new forms of governance shape new academic identities.

One of the results of the introduction of “impact” as a criterion within the research excellence framework, suggested Michael Power, professor of accounting at the LSE, was the birth of some strange creatures known as “impactful academics” and “impactees”.

matthew.reisz@tsleducation.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

Wish I could follow this as I'm sure it's replete with meaning. Instead all I can seem to get is a whole load of sound bites.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride