Cardiff University v-c issues warning over Wales quality plans

As funding council plans to keep independent reviews, Colin Riordan says UK-wide system must be protected

May 19, 2016
Colin Riordan, vice-chancellor, Cardiff University

A redrawn standards regime for Welsh universities that retains the requirement for independent cyclical review must not lead to further fragmentation of the UK-wide quality system, according to a leading vice-chancellor.

The quality assessment framework proposed by the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales incorporates many of the changes already announced by its sister body in England, including monitoring of standards via data returns, vouching by governing bodies and incorporation of quality into funding council assurance visits.

But, unlike the Higher Education Funding Council for England’s plan to abolish the requirement for regular reviews against baseline standards, currently conducted by the Quality Assurance Agency, Hefcw says that these should continue in Wales.

Reviews would have to be conducted at least every six years and the results would be a compulsory part of the fee and access plans that Welsh universities are required to submit to Hefcw.

Colin Riordan (pictured), the vice-chancellor of Cardiff University, said that the prospect of fragmentation of quality assessment – and the potential decline in the comparability of standards for students from elsewhere in the UK and overseas – must be guarded against.

“We want to be part of a UK-wide system and we would rather that there wasn’t fragmentation into different methods of quality assurance, and it’s a question of how that might be achieved under the proposals we have before us now,” Professor Riordan said.

“There is a danger that we drift away from a UK-wide system into a more atomised one, and we don’t want that done on a geographical basis.”

The Hefcw document also confirms that Wales intends to participate in the first phase of the teaching excellence framework, but a decision is yet to be taken on later stages.

Professor Riordan added that there was “definitely a potential risk” that the combination of the English proposals with the continued requirement for independent review could increase the burden of regulation on institutions, but he argued that this could be avoided if the new system were implemented “smartly and sensibly”.

A Hefcw spokeswoman said that the proposals reflected the views expressed in a consultation and that the continued requirement for external assurance “will help to maintain Welsh universities’ reputation internationally”.

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (15 December 2016)

Mark Readman offers a guide to help selfish academics ensure that everyone at a conference knows they are very special indeed

David Parkins Christmas illustration (22 December 2016)

A Dickensian tale, set in today’s university

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (5 January 2017)

Fixing problems in the academic job market by reducing the number of PhDs would homogenise the sector, argues Tom Cutterham

Houses of Parliament, Westminster, government

There really is no need for the Higher Education and Research Bill, says Anne Sheppard

Jefferson with paint over face

Buildings and statues dedicated to people whose views clash with modern values can cause difficulties, but is tearing down history the answer?