Canadian academics question Toronto’s response to ‘discrimination’

University of Toronto must prove professor’s comments constitute ‘violation of law’, says Canadian Association of University Teachers

October 26, 2016
Freedom of speech
Source: iStock

The University of Toronto’s response to a professor’s comments on gender identity may risk infringing academic freedom and free speech rights, according to the national association for academics.

Jordan Peterson, professor of psychology at the university, has been at the centre of a furore after he made two hour-long YouTube lectures criticising the institution’s policy on “political correctness” and objecting to government legislation that would prohibit discrimination based on gender identity and gender expression.

In one of the videos, he says: “I don’t recognise another person’s right to determine what pronouns I use to address them. I won’t do it.”

In response, the university issued a warning about speech or acts that “silence or demean individuals or groups”, and senior administrators sent Professor Peterson a letter asking him to stop making statements that could be considered discriminatory under provincial human rights legislation, according to The Globe and Mail.

However, David Robinson, executive director of the Canadian Association of University Teachers, told the newspaper that whether Professor Peterson’s comments constitute the kind of speech that can be limited under Canadian legislation is up for debate.

“The onus is on the university to prove that his refusal to use certain pronouns constitutes a violation of law,” he said.

“In the context of a university, we believe that academic freedom and free expression is a core foundational value. There would have to be serious illegal expression that would justify any limitation.”

Last week, Kelly Hannah-Moffat, vice-president of human resources and equity at the university, said that the Ontario Human Rights Code protects against discrimination based on gender expression and gender identity.

“Academic freedom means faculty are free to criticise laws; but they are also expected to abide by these laws,” she said.

ellie.bothwell@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Worried man wiping forehead
Two academics explain how to beat some of the typical anxieties associated with a doctoral degree

Felipe Fernández-Armesto takes issue with a claim that the EU has been playing the sovereignty card in Brexit negotiations

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

John McEnroe arguing with umpire. Tennis

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman explain how to negotiate your annual performance and development review

Man throwing axes

UCU attacks plans to cut 171 posts, but university denies Brexit 'the reason'