‘Western civilisation’ curriculum rebuffed again at Queensland

Australian university says board of studies veto does not directly affect approval process

五月 21, 2019
Statue of Plato, Academy of Athens, Greece
Source: iStock

Plans for philanthropically funded Western civilisation majors have met further opposition at the University of Queensland after the board of studies for the university’s humanities and social sciences faculty again rejected the programme.

In a statement to members, the Queensland branch of the National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) said the board had voted against approving the curriculum. The vote took place during an “extraordinary” meeting convened to consider revisions made after the board rejected the curriculum in April.

The statement cites concerns about academic freedom and university autonomy, and claims that the courses – to be funded by the Ramsay Centre for Western Civilisation – are “inferior” to the university’s current humanities offerings.

“This second rejection by the HASS board of studies surely means that if UQ management intend to honour their commitment to proper academic governance, they have no option but to drop the Ramsay proposal and cease negotiating with the Ramsay Centre,” the union says.

A university spokesman said the statement was “misleading” because the board of studies had only an advisory role. “It is not an approval body as implied by the NTEU,” the spokesman said.

He said the university would follow the normal approval process prescribed by its policies. “The feedback from the meeting will be considered carefully as the programme progresses through its standard governance process,” the spokesman said.

Proposals to run Ramsay-funded Western civilisation courses have met fierce opposition in several states and territories. The Australian National University called off negotiations with Ramsay last year, citing institutional autonomy concerns.

Ramsay remains in discussions with the universities of Sydney and Queensland, where hundreds of staff have campaigned against its proposals. Wollongong, the only university to so far announce an agreement with Ramsay, has been accused of sidestepping its own governance rules – triggering complaints to the higher education regulator and the New South Wales Supreme Court.

In February, Ramsay tried to defuse opposition by saying it would inscribe future agreements with statements of commitment to academic freedom. But in an open letter to the HASS board of studies, NTEU branch president Andrew Bonnell says “no amount of finessing” would make the proposal acceptable.

“The design of the Ramsay programme, in which funding is fixed-term and therefore [dependent] on a politically committed board…is structurally opposed to precepts of academic freedom and autonomy, whatever commitments the Ramsay Centre may sign up to,” the letter says.

john.ross@timeshighereducation.com

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

相关文章

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多