Michael Arthur to step down as UCL president

Leader, who will relinquish post in September 2020, credited with leaving institution in ‘very strong’ position

August 13, 2019
Michael Arthur

Michael Arthur is to step down as president and provost of UCL in September 2020.

Professor Arthur will have spent seven years at the helm of the Russell Group university when he makes way for a replacement at the end of the next academic year.

The university has launched a global search to recruit a successor.

Victor Chu, UCL’s chair of council, said that Professor Arthur was leaving the university in a “very strong position”.

Professor Arthur has overseen significant expansion of UCL’s student numbers and research activities, and led the development of the institution’s £516 million new campus, UCL East, on the Olympic Park site in Stratford.

But he has also contended with long-running staff discontent over an alleged top-down management style, and concern that the UCL East project could jeopardise the institution’s financial stability.

Professor Arthur said that he was “incredibly proud of and humbled by the commitment of our outstanding community at UCL and of all that we have achieved together”.

“After spending nearly two decades as a university leader, I have decided to step down from the role. I am looking forward to pursuing new and different opportunities,” Professor Arthur said.

Professor Arthur joined UCL in December 2013, succeeding Malcolm Grant, having been vice-chancellor of the University of Leeds from 2004 to 2013.

Prior to that, he had several roles at the University of Southampton, including dean of the Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences.

A former chair of the Russell Group, he is a hepatologist, with research interests in liver cell biology and the cell and molecular pathogenesis of liver fibrosis.

nick.mayo@timeshighereducation.com

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

相关文章

相关大学

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October