CMA tells universities to improve treatment of students

Three institutions agree to changes over fees, course costs and progression

七月 22, 2016
Small print

Three universities have been told to improve the way that they deal with students, as the Competition and Markets Authority expresses concern about the slow pace of sector-wide compliance with consumer law.

In its first review of consumer law compliance in UK higher education, the CMA says that too many institutions were still using terms that gave them wide discretion to vary tuition fees or change courses, were not clear enough about additional course costs, or prevented students from progressing and graduating if they owed non-academic debts.

Three institutions – Bucks New University, the University of Buckingham, and Birkbeck, University of London – have agreed undertakings with the CMA requiring them to make improvements.

But the CMA says that it has so far reviewed information provided to students by only a sample of institutions, so the concerns that it had identified “may be occurring more widely”.

The watchdog, which began work in higher education in 2014, warns that universities that fail to comply with consumer law could face criminal prosecution.

A survey of 66 providers, conducted by the CMA, found that all but one had made changes to the information that they provide to prospective students as a result of guidance from the CMA. A further 77 per cent had amended the information that they provided to current students, while 85 per cent had changed their practices, policies, rules or regulations.

But the CMA says that swifter progress is needed.

“We are concerned by how long it is taking some providers to complete their reviews and implement the necessary changes, where necessary,” the report says. “We would urge providers to ensure these changes are finalised and implemented as a matter of urgency, given it is now over a year since the CMA’s 2015 higher education advice was published and we are approaching the start of the new academic year.”

The undertakings announced alongside the report require universities to remove terms that prevents students from progressing or graduate if they owe non-academic debts (Bucks New and Buckingham); improve information around additional course costs (Buckingham); amend terms that allow wide variation in tuition fees (Birkbeck and Buckingham); and ensure that the complaints process does not deter students from raising or pursuing complaints (Birkbeck and Bucks New).

Nisha Arora, the CMA’s senior director of consumer issues, welcomed the three universities’ “constructive engagement”.

“The CMA expects all higher education providers to comply with consumer protection law and has drawn the findings of its compliance review to their attention,” she said. “The CMA is continuing to look at issues relating to other providers and should we be made aware of other concerns, this could result in further action, either by the CMA, other enforcers, or sector regulators.”

Rebecca Bunting, vice-chancellor of Bucks New, said that the process had allowed it “to ensure our policies and procedures are fully up to date and in compliance with the relevant legislation”.

A Buckingham spokeswoman said that the information it provided to students was “now fully consistent with CMA guidance”. Procedures had “already been revised” prior to the CMA’s investigation, but “had not been published on our website”.

A Birkbeck spokeswoman said that the college was “committed to providing clear and accurate information for applicants and students” and had been “happy to work constructively with the CMA to give even greater clarity”. 

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

Please login or register to read this article.

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

Reader's comments (1)

While there is a need to ensure that students are not cheated or misled, the CMA , and the reaction to its statements, is removing the ability of lecturers to change degree content to reflect changes in the subject areas. The result is that degree content has to be specified clearly a year before a student joins and has to be in place for the three or four years of the degree. As the specification includes final year content, this is five years to delivery. There needs to be a balance between providing accurate information for choices to be made, and providing the best, most relevant, content to students at the point of delivery. Education is not a pre-packaged product, bought off the shelf, despite this Government's wishes and the statements of the CMA. Education needs to be real, relevant and contemporary to benefit students. Allowing change is essential for motivating students and lecturers. Bring it back.

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments