Catholic and Islamic voices decry stem cell ‘bias’

Religious sense ‘cover-up’ in emphasis on embryonic work

February 21, 2013

The success of adult stem cell research is being underplayed in favour of more controversial work using embryonic cells, according to religious figures who blame “aggressive secularism” and the “personal investment” of researchers in their projects for the alleged bias.

The Catholic Church and many Islamic scholars teach that while human embryonic stem cell research is wrong, efforts to develop treatments using adult stem cells and adult cells reprogrammed into embryo-like states should be encouraged.

Worldwide there have been three clinical trials using embryonic cells, which are derived from embryos discarded during in vitro fertilisation treatment, and none using reprogrammed adult or “induced pluripotent stem” (IPS) cells. Last year, the Wellcome Trust called on the European Union to continue funding all avenues of stem cell research as it was “too early to tell which route will be the most effective”.

Speaking at a debate titled “Stem cell research, abortion and the ‘soul of the embryo?’”, Abdul Majid Katme, a spokesman for the Islamic Medical Association UK, said he was astonished that many people did not know about the “high success rate” of adult stem cell technology.

“I tend to believe lately there is a lot of cover-up about success in adult stem cells and people pushing all the time for embryonic stem cell [research],” Dr Katme said.

When questioned, he attributed this to a “militant, aggressive secularism” taking over society.

Meanwhile Gerard Hughes, a Jesuit priest and tutor in philosophy at Campion Hall, a permanent private hall at the University of Oxford, said researchers might be holding back on publicising their work in adult stem cells as they were interested in first obtaining intellectual property rights.

David Albert Jones, director of Catholic institute the Anscombe Bioethics Centre and visiting professor at St Mary’s University College, Twickenham, added that “personal and professional investments” in projects could be a reason “why things continue, even after another option has become viable”.

Researchers in the field - who were not represented on the panel - argue that although IPS cells are promising tools, more research is needed before they can be used safely.

The event on 13 February, which also featured John Harris, Lord Alliance professor of bioethics at the University of Manchester, was part of the Westminster Faith Debates series supported by Lancaster University, the Arts and Humanities Research Council and the Economic and Social Research Council.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Viewed

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham