David Eastwood, Liz Gloyn, Stephen Halliday, Andrew McInnes and Jane O’Grady...

A weekly look over the shoulders of our scholar-reviewers

July 25, 2013

David Eastwood, vice-chancellor and principal, University of Birmingham, is reading Ross McKibbin’s Parties and People: England 1914-1951 (Oxford University Press, 2010). “A brilliant explanation of why England became ‘a society with powerful democratic impulses but political structures and habits of mind which could not adequately contain them’. The distillation of a lifetime’s reflection, and as compelling as it is engaging. The historian’s art at its most disciplined and distinguished.”

The Map of Love by Ahdaf Soueif

Liz Gloyn, teaching fellow in Roman literature, Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity, University of Birmingham, is reading Ahdaf Soueif’s The Map of Love (Bloomsbury, 2000). “A richly textured and compelling novel about a family mystery – the puzzle is Anna Winterbourne, an English widow who travelled to Egypt and eventually married an Egyptian Pasha. As Amal, Anna’s great-niece, reconstructs her story from lost family papers, the echoes between the past and the present in both the political and personal spheres become ever more apparent.”

A Walk-On Part by Chris Mullin

Stephen Halliday, panel tutor in history, Institute of Continuing Education, University of Cambridge, is reading Chris Mullin’s A Walk-On Part (Profile, 2012). “This is the third part of Mullin’s account of New Labour in its pomp. The diaries lack the vanity of Kenneth Clark’s diaries and the self-righteousness of Tony Benn but are for that reason more amusing, informative and charming. They also have the ring of truth, which is bad news for some of those who appear in their pages.”

Fiction and the Reading Public by Q. D. Leavis

Andrew McInnes, lecturer in English (education and scholarship), University of Exeter, is reading Q. D. Leavis’ Fiction and the Reading Public (Chatto & Windus, 1965). “After attending an excellent paper on the Leavises’ idea of the 18th century, I was inspired to read this combative book, first published in 1932. Here, Leavis offers refreshing readings of 18th-century writers, especially Hannah More. It concludes with a rousing peroration on researching, teaching and publishing on culture: a passionate plea for public engagement that is especially significant today.”

What Computers Still Can't Do by Hubert L Dreyfus

Jane O’Grady, lecturer in philosophy at City University London and the London School of Philosophy, is reading Hubert Dreyfus’ What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason (MIT Press, 1972 and 1992). “Forty-one years ago, Dreyfus challenged the assumption that computers would soon be able to perform, in fact outperform, human thinking. Despite the adjustments to cognitive science made as a result of his critique, What Computers Still Can’t Do continues to be a pertinent title to the revamped 1992 edition of this classic.”

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham