Shore up the foundations of world-class science, v-c urges

University of Leicester head tells ARMA conference that the start of research careers and early work needs support

June 11, 2015
Workmen working on building foundations
Source: 1000 Words/

The UK needs to “think carefully” about the proportion of national research funding that should be focused on world-class science compared with the foundations of such work, a vice-chancellor has said.

Paul Boyle, president and vice-chancellor of the University of Leicester, said that many of the best researchers did not begin their careers at the prestigious institutions that they end up working in such as Imperial College London and the universities of Cambridge and Oxford.

The start of research careers and incremental developments in science need to be supported as well as world-class work, he argued.

Professor Boyle, who was until 2014 the head of the Economic and Social Research Council, was speaking at the conference of the Association of Research Managers and Administrators in Brighton on 2 June.

He said that the Higher Education Funding Council for England’s decision to focus quality-related funding more heavily on 4*, or world-class, research as judged by the research excellence framework is “persuasive”.

“There is no question that as a nation we need to be producing more 4* world-class research…But it does raise interesting questions about the concentration of science,” Professor Boyle said.

“We need to think carefully as a nation about how much of the national funding, whether it is from the REF, research councils or wherever it comes from, should be focused on world-class research and how much on the foundations,” he said.

“We all know that many of the best researchers that work at Imperial, Cambridge and Oxford and other institutions did not necessarily start in those institutions and it is the beginnings of their careers that we need to make sure are also supported,” he added.

He said that many scientific breakthroughs build on incremental developments. “If we carry on concentrating too much then there is a risk to some of the breadth that we have in the UK,” he added.

The UK is unique in Europe as it has a “very deep” breadth of research that makes a “really powerful statement” about its higher education, he said.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments


Article originally published as: Shore up the foundations of science, says v-c (11 June 2015)

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham