Nice place: Pops bought it for me

David Willetts points to the price paid by Ivy League for donor cash. David Matthews writes

December 20, 2012

Wealthy donors to Ivy League universities can “buy a place” for their offspring and admissions policies at elite US universities are far less meritocratic than anything that would be accepted in the UK, the universities and science minister has argued.

David Willetts made the comments in a debate with Lord Rees of Ludlow, the astronomer royal, about the future of UK higher education.

He said that large donations to prestigious private universities in the US meant that favours were returned in terms of the admission of donors’ children.

“You can buy a place for your child, although obviously your child has to meet a pretty high minimum standard,” Mr Willetts said.

“To escape the constraints of state funding, [the Ivy League universities] have to make other sacrifices so as to achieve alternative sources of income and…they’ll trade off some choice [over admissions]…in return for securing a stream of income,” he added.

“Is that what we would do in the UK or not?” he asked delegates at the debate, Can British Universities Keep Ahead in a Global Future?, held in London on 12 December by the Politeia thinktank.

Top US universities also admitted students based on ethnicity and sporting prowess, he added.

Such policies go “way beyond anything the [UK] media would regard as acceptable”, in terms of shaping admissions using non- academic criteria, Mr Willetts said.

He added: “They ‘mould the class’ in the Ivy League in a way that is completely contrary to the English model.”

Private US universities have been accused before of giving preferential access to the children of major donors or influential politicians, for example in Pulitzer prize-winning journalist Daniel Golden’s book The Price of Admission (2005). The book also alleged discrimination against Asian American applicants.

Lord Rees argued that students should be able to transfer into top-ranked UK universities in their second year of study in order to boost access to elite institutions, citing the California model as an example to follow.

A “substantial fraction” of students attending the University of California, Berkeley come via a “lower-tier college” in the state system, he added.

Responding, Mr Willetts said of the California model: “It is a system that is delivered by a board of regents [that has] control and authority over the individual universities.

“In other words, diversity is delivered at the cost of autonomy.”

david.matthews@tsleducation.com.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

men in office with feet on desk. Vintage

Three-quarters of respondents are dissatisfied with the people running their institutions

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate