Willetts urges fresh expansion

David Willetts has warned of the need to expand the number of higher education places between the end of this decade and 2035 to cope with a growing young population

October 21, 2013

The universities and science minister has released a pamphlet marking the 50th anniversary of the Robbins report, which paved the way for a huge expansion of UK university places.

In Robbins Revisited: Bigger and Better Higher Education, published by the Social Market Foundation thinktank, Mr Willetts says: “We are currently in the middle of a ten-year period of decline in the size of the young English population, with the number of 18-20 year olds expected to continue to fall until 2020.”

However, because of a new baby boom starting at the turn of the millennium, the 18 to 20 year-old population is set to grow from 2021 and should be almost 200,000 higher in 2035 than in 2011, he predicts.

Mr Willetts then explores a number of ways to predict the likely number of higher education students by 2020 and 2035.

Assuming social groups go to university in similar proportions as at present, and also accounting for a slight growth in the number of youngsters from more advantaged social backgrounds, the number of entrants in 2020 would be 330,000, down from 368,000 in 2011.

By 2035, entrant numbers would have grown to 410,000, Mr Willetts calculates, a 12 per cent increase on 2011 numbers.

But he also looks at numbers if “unmet demand” – students who would like to go to university but fail to get a place – were filled.

Around 50,000 students today fall into this category, he acknowledges, and if unmet demand were fulfilled, 460,000 entrants would go to university in 2035.

Mr Willetts also bemoans what he sees as an excessive focus on research.

“Looking back we will wonder how the higher education system was ever allowed to become so lopsided away from teaching,” he says.

But he argues that coalition reforms, which are partly designed to stimulate competition between universities for students, are changing this balance.

“Teaching and academic feedback are increasingly moving centre stage where they belong,” he says.


Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Reader's comments (1)

it's nice to see David Willetts (or at least Anna Fazackerly and Nick Nilman) have a go at reading the Robbins Report. They do a wonderful job of taking from this important document just what they want to read, and leaving the core bits behind. Robbins stands for a system of higher education - not a market (try finding the word 'market' in the entire report - it's only there a couple of times, and never in the context of a market for higher education). Robbins stands for a funded system of higher education - not borrowed from future generations on terms that make the nuclear power plant commisioning look sane. Why does research dominate? Look how government favours the research elite and wonder why. Willetts has lauded UK universities founded in the last 60 years which are in the top parts of global league tables; they've not got there because of a devotion to teaching. So, good on them for writing it. But a partiial reading (with a few mistakes - Keele was founded 15 years before Robbins) allows them to cone to a conclusion antithetical to that of the Robbins Committee.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments