Willetts does not rule out fees rise

Labour on the attack as RAB nears ‘break-even point’

March 24, 2014

Universities and science minister David Willetts has refused to rule out an increase in tuition fees after the next election amid growing concerns that a “student loan time bomb” may damage university funding.

When asked in a television interview if fees may rise after the 2015 general election, Mr Willetts said that “we will have to see how the income of universities performs”.

Speaking on Channel 4 News, Mr Willetts also declined to comment on whether the threshold at which graduates start repaying their loans would be lowered from its current level of £21,000.

“We have a structure for £9,000 and £21,000 and that is working,” said Mr Willetts.

The interview follows the news, announced on 20 March, that 45 per cent of student loans will not be repaid owing to lower-than-expected graduate earnings. The Treasury had initially forecast that this figure, known as the resource accounting and budgeting (RAB) charge, would be just 28 per cent when fees rose to £9,000 a year.

As Times Higher Education reported last week, the government is now nearing the “break-even point” when the new £9,000 tuition fee system becomes more costly than the old fee regime.

If the RAB reaches 48.6 per cent, the economic cost of the 2012-13 higher education reforms will exceed the system it replaced, a report by consultants London Economics says.

Chuka Umunna, Labour’s shadow business secretary, said ministers “have got their sums badly wrong and left a black hole in the student finance budget running into billions of pounds.”

“In 2010 David Cameron and the Tory-led government trebled tuition fees and cut funding for universities and students, but this new evidence shows their system could end up costing the taxpayer more than the one it replaced,” he said.

Mr Umunna told BBC One’s Andrew Marr Show on 23 March that the revelations over the cost of the new fee regime was “catastrophic, for the Liberal Democrats in particular”.

“Having trebled tuition fees in the name of reducing the deficit and saving the exchequer money, you are at best seeing it raise little money at all; at worst actually costing more,” he said.

“This…is a student loan time bomb that is actually already exploding under the government.”

However, Mr Willetts has dismissed the reports of a “black hole” in university funding, saying the estimates of how much students will repay are likely to “bounce around” depending on what experts are forecasting for earnings over the next 35 years.


You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham