Willetts does not rule out fees rise

Labour on the attack as RAB nears ‘break-even point’

March 24, 2014

Universities and science minister David Willetts has refused to rule out an increase in tuition fees after the next election amid growing concerns that a “student loan time bomb” may damage university funding.

When asked in a television interview if fees may rise after the 2015 general election, Mr Willetts said that “we will have to see how the income of universities performs”.

Speaking on Channel 4 News, Mr Willetts also declined to comment on whether the threshold at which graduates start repaying their loans would be lowered from its current level of £21,000.

“We have a structure for £9,000 and £21,000 and that is working,” said Mr Willetts.

The interview follows the news, announced on 20 March, that 45 per cent of student loans will not be repaid owing to lower-than-expected graduate earnings. The Treasury had initially forecast that this figure, known as the resource accounting and budgeting (RAB) charge, would be just 28 per cent when fees rose to £9,000 a year.

As Times Higher Education reported last week, the government is now nearing the “break-even point” when the new £9,000 tuition fee system becomes more costly than the old fee regime.

If the RAB reaches 48.6 per cent, the economic cost of the 2012-13 higher education reforms will exceed the system it replaced, a report by consultants London Economics says.

Chuka Umunna, Labour’s shadow business secretary, said ministers “have got their sums badly wrong and left a black hole in the student finance budget running into billions of pounds.”

“In 2010 David Cameron and the Tory-led government trebled tuition fees and cut funding for universities and students, but this new evidence shows their system could end up costing the taxpayer more than the one it replaced,” he said.

Mr Umunna told BBC One’s Andrew Marr Show on 23 March that the revelations over the cost of the new fee regime was “catastrophic, for the Liberal Democrats in particular”.

“Having trebled tuition fees in the name of reducing the deficit and saving the exchequer money, you are at best seeing it raise little money at all; at worst actually costing more,” he said.

“This…is a student loan time bomb that is actually already exploding under the government.”

However, Mr Willetts has dismissed the reports of a “black hole” in university funding, saying the estimates of how much students will repay are likely to “bounce around” depending on what experts are forecasting for earnings over the next 35 years.

jack.grove@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

United Nations peace keeper

Understanding the unwritten rules of graduate study is vital if you want to get the most from your PhD supervision, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (5 January 2017)

Fixing problems in the academic job market by reducing the number of PhDs would homogenise the sector, argues Tom Cutterham

Houses of Parliament, Westminster, government

There really is no need for the Higher Education and Research Bill, says Anne Sheppard

poi, circus

Kate Riegle van West had to battle to bring her circus life and her academic life together

man with frozen beard, Lake Louise, Canada

Australia also makes gains in list of most attractive English-speaking nations as US slips