Who needs court? asks Cardiff University

Consultation questions need for the body after it blocked the appointment of Griff Rhys Jones as chancellor

November 20, 2014

Cardiff University has questioned the future of its court, and the body’s role in the selection of the chancellor, six months after it blocked the appointment of Griff Rhys Jones to the ceremonial post.

A consultation has been launched that asks: “Given that council is the governing body of the university, is there a continuing role for the court?”

It also asks if future chancellors should continue to be appointed by the court on the recommendation of the council, or whether the final choice should lie with the council – either acting alone or after a nominations process carried out with court representation.

It was in April that Cardiff suffered the embarrassment of being forced to call off the announcement of Mr Rhys Jones as chancellor after the court refused to ratify the comedian’s selection by the council.

By this time – about half an hour before the appointment was due to be made public – the university had already distributed photographs of Mr Rhys Jones in the chancellor’s robes to the media.

It was claimed that the council had not indicated that the serving chancellor, Nobel prizewinning scientist Sir Martin Evans, was eligible for reappointment. Mr Rhys Jones withdrew from consideration, and Sir Martin embarked on a second term.

Brian Ford, a tutor in the University of Cambridge’s Institute of Continuing Education and a member of the court, has written to Cardiff vice-chancellor Colin Riordan saying he is “not the only person to be perplexed” by the consultation.

“It seems to call into question the very existence of court,” writes Professor Ford. “Yet, as recent events have shown, it is clear that it is only the existence of the university court that ensures that the governance of Cardiff is properly monitored.”

The consultation asks about the term of office of the chancellor and whether a second term should be permitted.

A Cardiff spokeswoman said the court “was advised that it would be consulted” as part of the process, with a recent survey of its 220 members used to gather views. She also insisted that there were “no plans” to abolish the court.

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham