UUK reacts to fears over immigration bill

Universities UK has moved to head off any prospect that the new immigration bill, announced today in the Queen’s Speech, might herald a crackdown on the use of public services by overseas university students.

May 8, 2013

Part of the bill’s aim is to ensure that migrants from outside and within the EU are either prevented from using, or contribute towards, some public services such the NHS.

Times Higher Education reported in March on sector concerns that such measures could deter overseas students from coming to the UK.

The Queen announced today that the immigration bill “will ensure that this country attracts people who will contribute and deters those who will not”.

The Guardian reports that it is unclear whether this means that temporary migrants will be required in future to have private health insurance or to post some kind of “NHS bond” before arriving in the UK. “Coalition talks on this remain deadlocked,” the newspaper adds.

Nicola Dandridge, UUK chief executive, said recent evidence on international students “suggests they place significantly less burden on public services than other kinds of migrants. It is also a condition of their visa that they have no recourse to public funds.

“Many live in shared, student accommodation, which places less burden on council services. And owing to their age profile, they are less likely to require NHS care or have dependants.

“If the government’s aim is to make the UK a country that attracts people who will contribute, they need look no further than international students and international university staff.”

Vivienne Stern, head of political affairs at UUK, writes in a blog on the Queen’s Speech: “In the pre- and post-speech spin, ministers and Number 10 were keen to make special reference to the desirability of attracting legitimate international students. This really matters. It means that the importance of attracting international students is right up there at the top of the political agenda when they are talking about one of the most central policy issues of the next election.”

Ms Stern describes the intellectual property bill, also announced in the Queen’s Speech, as “the other big news” for higher education. “Although little detail is currently available we also expect the Bill to contain an amendment to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 which would exempt pre-publication research from Freedom of Information requests,” she says.


You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Alexander Wedderburn

Former president of the British Psychological Society remembered

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham

The University of Aberdeen

Tim Ingold and colleagues at the University of Aberdeen have created a manifesto that they hope will preserve higher education's true values