UUK attacks Labour on £6,000 fees

English vice-chancellors have warned Labour not to commit to lowering fees to £6,000, saying the policy would lead to funding cuts for universities

February 2, 2015

The 19 English board members of Universities UK today launched a pre-emptive attack on the policy – which Labour has been considering taking into the election but on which it is yet to take a final decision – with a letter in The Times.

The signatories, led by Sir Christopher Snowden, the UUK president and University of Surrey vice-chancellor, say: “Were this to happen, at least £10bn of additional public funding would need to be found and ring-fenced over the course of the next Parliament to close the gap.

“Given the many pressures on public finances, and with all political parties committed to further public spending cuts, it is implausible that any incoming government would be able to do this. The result would be cuts to universities that would damage the economy, affect the quality of students’ education, and set back work on widening access to higher education.”

There have been suggestions that Labour may soon announce plans for a wide-ranging review of higher education if it were in government. That could give the party cover to avoid announcing a detailed fees and funding policy before the election.

The UUK letter continues: “Any move to limit the number of students attending universities as a way of reducing costs would remove opportunities for young people and those seeking to return to education, and act as a barrier to economic growth.

“Applications to university are now at a record high and the proportion of applicants from lower socio-economic groups has risen. Given that fees are not paid until after a student graduates and is earning over £21,000, simply cutting the headline fee provides most benefit to higher-earning graduates.”

The letter argues that a “better way of supporting students, especially those from poorer backgrounds, would be for the government to provide greater financial support for living costs”.

And it concludes: “Cutting the fee cap does not help poorer students and risks the quality of education for all.”

Liam Byrne, Labour’s shadow universities, science and skills minister, warned last year that vice-chancellors would be “on the wrong side of public opinion” and invite criticism of their high salaries if they publicly came out against a £6,000 fee policy.

Mr Byrne said in response to the UUK letter: “The Tory-led government trebled fees and now it is crystal clear that the student finance system is going bust, saddling students with debts most will never repay of £43,500 on average, and costing the taxpayer more than the system it replaced.

“According to new Ucas analysis, trebled fees have deterred thousands of potential students applying.

“We will announce our policy in due course ahead of the general election.”


Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Reader's comments (2)

It is important to ensure that the Vice Chancellors (VCs) are not seen to speak for the whole sector on this issue. The increase in student fee to £9K was a disaster for students, their parents and the taxpayer. A reduction to £6000 pa should be the starting point and ultimately funded by a graduate tax. In the meantime, there will be a funding gap which could be filled by a one parliament increase in the top rate of income tax. Thus, those who have benefited most from 'free' higher education (including VCs) can help the next generation to get an education without being crippled with debt.
I'm not sure why Vice Chancellors are worried: the way to a knighthood in their profession seems to be to cut staff gleefully in order to balance their budgets. But an ability to weep crocodile tears while doing so ensures that you will get endowment contributions: indeed the man who tried to cut over 300 jobs is now the Rector of an Oxford college, much to the horror of those who were stupid enough to give money to a place they thought a bastion of humane learning.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments