Universities’ use of recruitment agents under scrutiny

Government considering regulation that would further hamper enrolment of international students, sector leaders fear

February 25, 2016
People climbing rocks, Snoqualmie Falls, Washington
Source: Alamy
Helping hand: recruiting agents were described as a ‘useful filter mechanism’

Universities’ use of overseas recruitment agents is being reviewed by the UK government, amid warnings that regulation would be another barrier to international student enrolment.

Times Higher Education understands that the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has approached sector agencies in recent weeks asking for assessments of standards in this area and, it is thought, potential controls that could be introduced.

About one in three international students in the UK is thought to be introduced to their university by an agent, and combined institutional spend on commission payments topped £89 million in 2013-14, according to a THE investigation.

While there have been calls for applicants to be given greater protection against mis-selling, the government’s interest is thought to be driven by concern that some agents could be accomplices in immigration offences. About one in three cases of alleged impropriety uncovered by THE involved the use of supposedly fraudulent documents or qualifications.

There is less clarity, however, around what action the government could take, when almost all agents are based overseas. One option would be to require universities to only use agents who were part of a register, or met certain requirements.

But Dominic Scott, chief executive of the UK Council for International Student Affairs, said that he did not receive complaints about agents, who could be a “very useful filter mechanism” to ensure that only bona fide students were presented to universities.

“There are a range of measures that are already in place to make sure that agents are putting forward good and credible applicants,” he said. “The last thing we need is yet one more obstacle [to international recruitment].”

Vincenzo Raimo, pro vice-chancellor (global engagement) at the University of Reading, said that the 10 per cent limit on institutions’ visa refusal rates meant that any agent who put forward fraudulent students would soon be dropped.

“Agents have a choice of countries and universities with which to work with and, if the UK makes it harder for agents to work with us, they will stop working with us and that will damage recruitment to the UK,” Mr Raimo said.

A Universities UK spokesman confirmed that the organisation “was asked recently by BIS to feed back on any issues relating to the standard practice of universities using official agents to represent them and recruit students overseas”.

A BIS spokesman said: “We constantly review the best ways to support the higher education sector in attracting international students, and have ongoing discussions with stakeholders on this and other topics.”

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Use of agents under scrutiny

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Felipe Fernández-Armesto takes issue with a claim that the EU has been playing the sovereignty card in Brexit negotiations

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

John McEnroe arguing with umpire. Tennis

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman explain how to negotiate your annual performance and development review

Man throwing axes

UCU attacks plans to cut 171 posts, but university denies Brexit 'the reason'

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald