Tsinghua head: prize students who challenge classroom ‘authority’

University’s emphasis on creativity, not exam scores, aims to help shift China away from ‘degree factory’ model, THE summit hears

May 2, 2019
Bin Yang
Bin Yang

The provost of China’s leading university has said that it is shifting towards cultivating students who feel comfortable challenging authority in the classroom, warning that focusing only on academic attainment risked turning campuses into “degree factories”.

Bin Yang, vice-president of Tsinghua University, told Times Higher Education’s Asia Universities Summit that the institution was “crossing over from cultivating ‘A’ students” – judged on their exam grades – “to ‘X’ students” – a model focused on a “spirit of disruptive innovation”.

And he highlighted reforms to the gao kao – the national system of university entrance exams that allocates students to different tiers of institution based entirely on their test scores – that aim to give universities more autonomy in their selection of students.

China’s economy was moving from an era of “high-speed growth” to one of “high-quality growth” reliant on innovation, Professor Yang said.

In China, “schools always pick the A students who have the highest scores in written exams”, he explained. “From kindergarten to the universities, students are always taking tests that have standard answers and [are] then ranked by their scores.”

But this model “encourages uniformity and discourages diversity and the possibility to be different and bold”, he warned.

“In the X model, the highest scores don’t necessarily make you the best leaders, learners, creators or ideal candidates for anything,” Professor Yang said. “We [at Tsinghua] appreciate, intrinsically, learning motivations more than…test grades.”

He continued: “There are lots of criticisms about the gao kao system. If central government gives us the freedom, the liberty to choose [students], do we know what kinds of…knowledge, skills and attributes matter and how to judge them?”

Another aim of the X model, Professor Yang said, was to “encourage the students to value [the] authority of idea, instead of [the] idea of authority, which is relatively difficult in Asian culture. In other words, students shouldn’t be afraid of challenging the current authority…The A model represents standardised learning as if the university teachers and faculty understand exactly what the future will bring to us.”

He added: “The A model facilitates the degree factory – the mass-produced, one-size-fits-all approach to higher education. The X model stands against standardised…notions of education and evaluation. Tsinghua is crossing over…from cultivating A students. What China and the world really need are X students.”

Professor Yang also said: “I believe that the X model approach will help Chinese universities and Asian universities to continue their rise and become global education leaders, not followers in the 21st century.”

Replying to questions from the audience, he noted that 10 Chinese provinces were reforming their university entrance exam procedures.

In Shanghai and Zhejiang provinces, students were judged “60 per cent by gao kao scores and 40 per cent by university criteria”, Professor Yang said. “So universities, they can select students by their stories and outcomes in other areas rather than just written exams. But it’s just in a very early stage.”

He warned: “One scandal can ruin all the reform battles…Then the central government, the president, would stop all the reforms. That’s my concern. So it’s very, very sensitive.”

john.morgan@timeshighereducation.com

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: More ‘disruptive’ students are needed in China

Related articles

Related universities

Reader's comments (2)

best article https://www.invertisuniversity.ac.in/
How on earth is this compatible with other articles found lately on THE? China’s universities on ‘front line’ of drive to promote ‘Xi Thought’ Government-led initiative establishes ‘at least 30’ research institutes on president’s thinking June 26, 2018 By John Morgan China tightens ideological control on campus Seven top universities establish political monitoring units in response to state ‘rectification reports’ August 30, 2017 By Jack Grove Several of China’s top universities are establishing units to monitor the politics of their lecturers after they were criticised for failing to promote Communist Party ideology. Chinese universities urge academics to ‘promote socialist values’ Move follows government accusation that ideological and political work at some top institutions was weak September 27, 2017 By Ellie Bothwell Leading universities in China are encouraging academics to write online articles promoting socialist values, with some offering authors the same academic credits that they would get for papers published in journals. According to the South China Morning Post, Zhejiang University issued a notice this month stating that content that is widely circulated online, shows “core socialist values” and influences public opinion with “correct thinking and culture” now carries the same weight as an academic paper – The notice added that content posted on the websites and social media platforms of Communist Party mouthpieces such as People’s Daily and Xinhua News Agency would receive the most credit. Jilin University is also handing out credits to faculty members whose propaganda is published on state media websites and major commercial news portals, according to the paper. Shanghai Jiao Tong University and the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China have launched similar schemes, while a number of other universities have promised to follow suit, according to the South China Morning Post. The moves follow calls made by China’s president Xi Jinping last year for academics to become advocates of socialist values and firm supporters of Communist Party rule.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Mary Beard’s recent admission that she is a ‘mug’ who works 100 hours a week caused a Twitter storm. But how hard is it reasonable for academics to work? Who should decide? And should the mugs be obliged to keep quiet? Seven academics have their say

20 February

Sponsored

Featured jobs