Spin cycle: 11 research-intensives foster over half of spin-outs in past decade

A group of 11 universities has produced more than half of all the spin-off companies to have been launched by higher education institutions in the past 10 years, according to new figures.

April 23, 2011

Spinouts UK, a newly launched database of information on the commercialisation of intellectual property in higher education, tracks the progress of spin-offs across the sector.

An analysis of its data reveals that Imperial College London produced more spin-offs than any other UK university. It fostered 59 new companies from 2000 to 2010.

The other high performers were also high-ranking research-intensive universities.

Imperial was followed by the universities of Oxford (which started 55 companies), Edinburgh (49), Cambridge (44), Warwick (36), Strathclyde (35), Newcastle (28), Bristol (28), Sheffield (28) and Queen’s University Belfast and Leeds (both 25).

Between them, these 11 universities fostered 412 of the 820 spin-off companies formed during the decade.

Around 10 per cent of universities fostered more than 20 companies in the past decade.

Scottish institutions produced more spin-off companies than those in any other region – 172, of which 125 are currently active.

Across the sector, sales of spin-offs totalled £3 billion.

Jonathan Harris, author of the study, said: “Despite promising signs, the UK is not yet commercialising its tremendous intellectual property and innovation in the same way as the US. I hope this survey and our annual updates will help to change that.”


You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan