Put a price on blue-skies research, scholar urges

David Cope defends merits of ‘monetising’ in impact-focused era

July 11, 2013

Source: Getty

Cost-effective: putting a price on curiosity-driven research may be helpful

Assigning a monetary value to curiosity-driven research might help it to satisfy demands for economic impact, the former director of the Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology has suggested.

In one of seven opinion pieces published by the University of Exeter’s Jisc-funded “Describe” project, aimed at exploring the meaning and assessment of impact, David Cope says he expects his suggestion “will start the brickbats flying in my direction”.

“The relevant, recognised and desirable impacts of research, we are told repeatedly, go way beyond the purely economic. There are some things in life which cannot be measured in economic terms – and this includes many research impacts,” he writes.

But Professor Cope, who between 1998 and 2012 led the body that informs parliamentarians about science and technology issues, notes that a “monetising” approach has been pursued in recent years by environmental economists in the hope of ensuring that green assets such as national parks receive “appropriate recognition in decision-making”.

Adopted approaches – “fragile though they may be” – include examining the way proximity to environmental assets affects house prices, and investigating how much money people are prepared to pay to travel to them and to preserve them.

Professor Cope, who is also a life member of Clare Hall, Cambridge, stresses that monetisation could not capture all the value of curiosity-driven research, and concedes that the analogy with environmental policy may be flawed.

But he notes that in its attempts to justify the economic impact of research, the Arts and Humanities Research Council – whose literature “sometimes suggests that it is really desperate to demonstrate impact” – inevitably concentrates on the research it funds in heritage, archaeology and museums, which feed into fee-charging exhibitions.

He was uncertain how to assign monetary value to the “greater knowledge about ninth to thirteenth century Norse society” brought about by researching “Reward and Betrayal in the Völsunga saga”.

“I fall back on suggesting some modest research exploration. However, I would also caution that, were such a study to be conducted, the researchers should constantly bear in mind [Oscar] Wilde’s Picture of Dorian Gray and its famous epithet about knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing,” he says.

The Describe project published its final report in May. Among its conclusions was a suggestion that institutions include impact in job descriptions and promotion criteria.


You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham