Provide alternative to current HE funding system, Labour told

Labour must provide an alternative on fees and funding if it wants to secure the student vote, according to the National Union of Students president

September 23, 2014

Toni Pearce was speaking yesterday at a fringe event at the Labour conference in Manchester.

Labour is considering unveiling an election pledge to lower fees to £6,000. But it appears to have dropped plans to announce the policy at its conference, as internal debate over how to fund the policy continues.

“This market has failed not just students…but the financial sustainability of our whole sector,” Ms Pearce said of the current system.

She told the event, hosted by the NUS and Million+: “I would really like to come to these conferences, [four] years on from the Browne review of higher education funding…and talk to you about teaching and learning and quality, and the things that students experience every day on their campuses.”

But, Ms Pearce continued: “I’m so tired of having to come back every year and have technical conversations about the loan book, about [loan write-off costs], about how you tinker with the system to make it slightly less worse for students and taxpayers.”

She said the past four years had seen “radical reform” from the coalition government. “The onus is on the Labour party now to give us an alternative,” she said.

Ms Pearce said that the Scottish referendum campaign showed young people are engaged in politics and “they do want to vote. We will get them out to vote.”

She added: “But the reality is we need to give them something to vote for. I’m really excited about the prospect of a fundamental shift and radical reform of the way higher education is funded and delivered…I really, really hope that’s the deal Labour will offer to universities and students.”

Michael Gunn, vice-chancellor of Staffordshire University and chair of Million+, said Labour had been listening to universities.

“But we do need clarity on its policies,” he said. “It would be useful to know, sometime soon, which way Labour is going to go on funding.

“We also need a bit of passion about higher education. We’ve had four years of students and graduates being told…they pick up more of the tab, while private colleges, many of them for-profit, have been allowed to expand, unregulated, at taxpayers’ expense.”

john.morgan@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Viewed

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham